Tuesday, 28, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dr.Dayaram Bhagwanji Narnawre & 2 ... vs State Of Maha.Thr.Ecy.Dept.Of ...
2017 Latest Caselaw 3164 Bom

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 3164 Bom
Judgement Date : 14 June, 2017

Bombay High Court
Dr.Dayaram Bhagwanji Narnawre & 2 ... vs State Of Maha.Thr.Ecy.Dept.Of ... on 14 June, 2017
Bench: Ravi K. Deshpande
                                             1           wp4198.00.odt

                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                         NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR


                          WRIT PETITION NO. 4198 OF 2000


 1]         Dr.Dayaram s/o Bhagwanji Narnawre,
            aged about 50 years, Occ. Medical
            Practitioner, R/o. Umred,
            Distt. Nagpur.

 2]         Harshal S/o. Dayaram Narnawre,
            aged about 17 years, through
            father Dr. Dayaram Narnaware,

 3]         Ujwal s/o Dayaram Narnawre,
            aged about 16 years, through
            father Dr. Dayaram Narnawre

            Petitioners 2 & 3 R/o Umred,
            Distt. Nagpur                ......                      PETITIONERS

                               ...VERSUS...

 1.         State of Maharashtra,
            Through its Secretary,
            Department of Tribal Development,
            Mantralaya, Mumbai.

 2.         Sub Divisional Officer, Umred,
            Distt. Nagpur.

 3.         The Maharashtra Health University,
            through its Registrar,
            Nashik, 

 4.         The Director of Technical Education,
            Maharashtra State, Central Building,
            Pune,

 5.         The Scheduled Tribe Caste Scrutiny Committee,
            Giriopeth, Opp. R.T.O. Nagpur ......         RESPONDENTS


::: Uploaded on - 16/06/2017                     ::: Downloaded on - 17/06/2017 00:48:57 :::
                                                   2              wp4198.00.odt

 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Shri S.Sanyal , counsel for Petitioners.
 Shri N.S.Rao, AGP for Respondent nos. 1,  2, 4 and 5
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                          CORAM: R. K. DESHPANDE, AND
                                        Mrs. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.

th DATE : 14 JUNE, 2017 .

ORAL JUDGMENT (P.C.)

1] The challenge in this petition is to the Government

Resolutions dated 24.04.1985 and 19.06.1985, holding that caste

Mana shown in the Entry No. 18 of "Gond" in Constitution

(Scheduled Tribe) Order in relation to the State of Maharashtra is

sub-tribe of "Gond". The Sub Divisional Officer, Umred, passed an

order on 03.07.2000 holding that the petitioner belonging to Mana

tribe has failed to establish his affinity with "Gond".

2] The controversy involved in this petition no longer

remains res-integra in view of the decisIon of the Apex Court in the

case of State of Maharashtra and others vrs. Mana Adim

Jamat Mandal, reported in 2006 (4) SCC 98. The Apex Court has

held that earlier two judgments; one in the case of Dina vrs.

Narayan Singh, reported in (1968) 38 ELR 212 and another in the

case of Dadaji vrs. Sukhdeobabu, reported in (1980) 1 SCC 621

stand impliedly overruled by the decision of the Constitution Bench

3 wp4198.00.odt

of the Apex Court in the case of State of Maharashtra vrs.

Milind, reported in 2001 (1) SCC 4. The Government Resolutions

under challenge reiterated the position in the aforesaid two

judgments which are overruled.

3] The Apex Court has now held in State of

Maharashtra vrs. Mana Adim Jamat Mandal that each of the

tribes specified in Entry 18 must be deemed to be a separate tribe

and not sub-tribe of "Gond". In view of this position, the order

passed by the Sub Divisional Officer holding that the petitioner

belonging to Mana tribe has failed to establish his affinity with

"Gond" cannot be sustained. The Scrutiny Committee has to

examine the case of the petitioner for Mana - Scheduled Tribe

category, which is not a sub-tribe of "Gond".

4] In view of above, writ petition is allowed. The order

dated 03.07.2000 passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Umred,

refusing to issue a caste certificate to the petitioner and his sons

showing that they belong to Mana - Scheduled Tribe category is

hereby quashed and set aside. The Sub Divisional Officer is

directed to issue caste certificate to the petitioner and his sons

showing that they belong to Mana - Scheduled Tribe Category.

4 wp4198.00.odt

However, these certificates shall obviously be subject to scrutiny

and verification by the Scheduled Tribes Caste Scrutiny

Committee. The certificate be issued within a period of one month

from the date of receipt of the order.

Rule is made absolute in these terms. No order as to

costs.

                                JUDGE                   JUDGE


 Rvjalit





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter