Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ganpatrao S/O. Madhavrao Mungde ... vs The State Of Maharashtra
2017 Latest Caselaw 3144 Bom

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 3144 Bom
Judgement Date : 14 June, 2017

Bombay High Court
Ganpatrao S/O. Madhavrao Mungde ... vs The State Of Maharashtra on 14 June, 2017
Bench: V.L. Achliya
                             
                   FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
                                        
       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY   
            APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
                              
  _____________________________________________________
 Office Notes, Office    |
 Memoranda of Coram,     |    Court's or Judge's orders
 appearances, Court's    |
 orders or directions          |
 and Registrar's orders  |
 ______________________________________________________
                 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2847/2017 
                                 IN 
                    CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.233/2017 

                          GANPATRAO MADHAVRAO MUNGDE & OTHERS
                                         VERSUS
                               THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA 
                                           ...
                        Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Bilolikar 
                                      Upendra B. 
                            APP for Respondents/State:Mr. .
                                            ...

                                            ...
                                 CORAM : V.L. ACHLIYA, J.
                                  Dated: 14th June, 2017
                                             ...
                           The   applicants   have   preferred   this 
                  application   seeking   suspension   of   the 
                  sentence   and   released   on   bail   during 
                  pendency   of   the   appeal     on   the   grounds   set 
                  out in the  application. 


                  2.       Heard   learned   counsel   for   the 
                  applicants-appellants   and   learned   APP   for 
                  the   respondent-State.   Perused   impugned 
                  judgment   and   order   passed   by   the   Trial 
                  Court.   The   applicants   were   tried   for 
                  committing offences punishable under section 
                  143, 147, 148, 326, 324, 323, 504, 506, 447, 
                  307   r.w.   149   of   the   Indian   Penal   Code.   On 
                  conclusion   of   trial   the   learned   Additional 




::: Uploaded on - 15/06/2017                    ::: Downloaded on - 16/06/2017 01:02:22 :::
                                                                     2847..17Crbapln
                                          2


                  Session   Judge   pleased   to   convict   the 
                  applicants-accused   under   section   324,   447 
                  read with section 149 and section 143, 147 of 
                  the Indian Penal Code.   The maximum sentence 
                  awarded   is   of   three   years   for   committing 
                  offence   punishable   under   section   324   of   the 
                  Indian   Penal   Code.   Learned   counsel   for   the 
                  applicants-accused submit that the applicants 
                  -appellants   have   good   case   to     succeed   in 
                  appeal.   During   the   trial   the   applicants-
                  appellants   were   on   bail.     On   conclusion   of 
                  trial   the   trial   court   has   suspended   the 
                  sentence.


                  3.       By   referring   the   injuries   sustained   by 
                  the   injured   witnesses   examined   by   the 
                  prosecution,   the   learned   counsel   for   the 
                  applicants-accused submits that, the injuries 
                  were   found   to   be   simple   in   nature.     He 
                  submits   that   there   is   no   cogent,   convincing 
                  and   reliable   evidence   to   sustain   the 
                  conviction.   Therefore,   urged   to   enlarge   the 
                  applicants on bail.


                  4.       On   the   other   hand   learned   APP   for   the 
                  respondent-State   has   opposed   the   application 
                  with contention that there is direct evidence 
                  to   connect   the   applicants-accused   with   the 
                  offences, for which they have been convicted. 
                  She   submits   that,   if   the   applicants   are 
                  enlarged   on   bail   they   may   cause   threats   to 
                  the   complainant   and   other   witnesses   and 



::: Uploaded on - 15/06/2017                       ::: Downloaded on - 16/06/2017 01:02:23 :::
                                                                     2847..17Crbapln
                                          3


                  possibility   of   their   absconding   cannot  be 
                  ruled out.


                  5.             Having   appreciated   the   submissions 
                  advanced in the light of overall facts of the 
                  case,     nature   of   the   offence,     the   reasons 
                  and findings recorded by the trial Court and 
                  the sentence awarded, I am of the view that, 
                  the   case   is   made   out   to   entertain     the 
                  application. Looking to pendency of cases, it 
                  may   not   be   possible   to   immediately   take   up 
                  this   appeal   for   final   hearing.     It   is 
                  therefore   desirable   to   enlarge   the 
                  applicants-accused on bail. I am, therefore, 
                  inclined   to   entertain   the   application   and 
                  pass the following order:


                                        ORDER

(1) Pending disposal of the appeal, the execution of substantive sentence stands suspended subject to deposit of fine amount.

(2) Pending disposal of the appeal, the applicants be released on bail on each of them furnishing bail in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with one surety in the like amount, on following conditions.

(i) Pending disposal of the appeal, the applicants shall attend Degloor Tq. Degloor District Nanded, on last day of each month.

(ii) The applicants shall not indulge into any offence of

2847..17Crbapln

similar nature during the pendency of the Appeal.

(iii) The applicants shall furnish the names of their three close relatives with their addresses and phone numbers.

(3) In the event of breach of any of the conditions of bail, the bail granted to the applicants will be liable to be cancelled.

(4) Bail be furnished in the trial Court.

(5) The Officer In-charge of the Police Station, Degloor is directed to submit the report of compliance of conditions of bail after every six months.

6. Criminal Applications stand disposed of

in above terms.

(V.L. ACHLIYA,J)

mkd/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter