Wednesday, 29, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sanjay Tribakrao Kamble vs The State Of Maharashtra And ...
2017 Latest Caselaw 2860 Bom

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 2860 Bom
Judgement Date : 7 June, 2017

Bombay High Court
Sanjay Tribakrao Kamble vs The State Of Maharashtra And ... on 7 June, 2017
Bench: Anoop V. Mohta
                                        1
                                                                WP/7437/2017


          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD


                     WRIT PETITION NO. 7437 OF 2017


 Sanjay Tribakrao Kamble,
 Age : 48 years, Occu. : Service,
 R/o Yashwant Nagar Old, Ausa Road,
 Behind Datta Mandir, Latur,
 Dist. Latur.                                ...      PETITIONER

          VERSUS

 1.       The State of Maharashtra
          Through its Secretary,
          for Social welfare Ministry
          Mantralaya Mumbai-32

 2.       The General Manager,
          Sahityaratn Annabhau Sathe
          Arthik Vikas Mahamandal,

 3.       The Managing Director,
          Sahityaratn Annabhau Sathe
          Arthik Vikas Mahamandal,
          The respondents No.2 and 3 both
          Head Office New Administrative
          Building No.2, 3rd Floor, Ramkrishna
          Chemburkar Marg, Chembur (East)
          Mumbai.                            ...      RESPONDENTS

 (Copy to be served on the offence
 of Government Pleader High Court
 Bombay Bench at Aurangabad.)
                                 .....
 Shri B.R.Kedar, Advocate for petitioner
 Shri A.B.Girase, G.P. for State
 Shri P.P.Chavan, Advocate for respondent No.2 & 3
                                 .....
 ____________________________________________________
                     WRIT PETITION NO. 6573 OF 2017
 Vishnu S/o Sonaji Sonawane,
 Age : 46 years, Occu. : Service,
 R/o Anand Nagar, Reogaon Road,
 Jalna.                           ...        PETITIONER



::: Uploaded on - 09/06/2017                 ::: Downloaded on - 10/06/2017 00:49:21 :::
                                      2
                                                                WP/7437/2017



          VERSUS

 1.       The State of Maharashtra
          Through its Secretary,
          for Social welfare Department
          Mantralaya Mumbai-32

 2.       The Managing Director,
          Sahityaratna Lokshahir Annabhau Sathe
          Vikas Mahamandal (Marayadit), Mumbai,
          New administrative building no.2,
          3rd floor, B-wing, R.C. Marg,
          Chembur (E) Mumbai.

 3.       The Dy. General Managing (Adm.),
          Sahityaratna Lokshahir Annabhau Sathe
          Vikas Mahamandal (Marayadit), Mumbai,
          New administrative building no.2,
          3rd floor, B-wing, R.C.Marg,
          Chembur (E) Mumbai.

 4.       The Regional Manager,
          Aurangabad Regional Office of
          Sahityaratna Lokshahir Annabhau Sathe
          Vikas Mahamandal (Marayadit),
          Regional Office Aurangabad.

 5.       The District Manager / Office Assistant/Clerk,
          District Branch Office of
          Sahityaratna Lokshahir Annabhau Sathe
          Vikas Mahamandal (Marayadit),
          At Aurangabad.

 6.    The District Manager/ Office Assistant/Clerk,
       District Branch office of
       Sahityaratna Lokshahir Annabhau Sathe
       Vikas Mahamandal (Maryadit),
       At Jalna.                           ...  RESPONDENTS
                                 .....
 Shri S.L.Bhapkar, Advocate for petitioner
 Shri M.B.Bharswadkar, A.G.P. for State
 Shri P.P.Chavan, Advocate for respondent No.6
                                 .....
 ____________________________________________________




::: Uploaded on - 09/06/2017                 ::: Downloaded on - 10/06/2017 00:49:21 :::
                                    3
                                                             WP/7437/2017


                     WRIT PETITION NO. 6574 OF 2017


 Tarachand s/o Vishwanath Kasabe,
 Age : 46 years, Occu. : Service,
 R/o Jalgaon, Tal.and Dist. Jalgaon.      ...      PETITIONER

          VERSUS

 1.       The State of Maharashtra
          Through its Secretary,
          for Social welfare Department
          Mantralaya Mumbai-32

 2.       The Managing Director,
          Sahityaratna Lokshahir Annabhau Sathe
          Vikas Mahamandal (Marayadit), Mumbai,
          New administrative building no.2,
          3rd floor, B-wing, R.C. Marg,
          Chembur (E) Mumbai.

 3.       The Dy. General Managing (Adm.),
          Sahityaratna Lokshahir Annabhau Sathe
          Vikas Mahamandal (Marayadit), Mumbai,
          New administrative building no.2,
          3rd floor, B-wing, R.C.Marg,
          Chembur (E) Mumbai.

 4.       The Regional Manager,
          Aurangabad Regional Office of
          Sahityaratna Lokshahir Annabhau Sathe
          Vikas Mahamandal (Marayadit),
          Regional Office Nashik.

 5.       The District Manager / Office Assistant/Clerk,
          District Branch Office of
          Sahityaratna Lokshahir Annabhau Sathe
          Vikas Mahamandal (Marayadit),
          At Jalgaon.                   ...   RESPONDENTS

                                .....
 Shri S.L.Bhapkar, Advocate for petitioner
 Shri A.V.Dheshmukh, A.G.P. for State
 Shri P.P.Chavan, Advocate for respondents.
                                .....
 ____________________________________________________




::: Uploaded on - 09/06/2017              ::: Downloaded on - 10/06/2017 00:49:21 :::
                                         4
                                                                    WP/7437/2017


                     WRIT PETITION NO. 6577 OF 2017


 Usha w/o Shriram Sonone/
 Usha d/o Shrirang Janjal
 Age : 52 years, Occu. : Service,
 R/o Bhimnagar, Bausingpura,
 Aurangabad.                                     ...      PETITIONER

          VERSUS

 1.       The State of Maharashtra
          Through its Secretary,
          for Social welfare Department
          Mantralaya Mumbai-32

 2.       The Managing Director,
          Sahityaratna Lokshahir Annabhau Sathe
          Vikas Mahamandal (Marayadit), Mumbai,
          New administrative building no.2,
          3rd floor, B-wing, R.C. Marg,
          Chembur (E) Mumbai.

 3.       The Dy. General Managing (Adm.),
          Sahityaratna Lokshahir Annabhau Sathe
          Vikas Mahamandal (Marayadit), Mumbai,
          New administrative building no.2,
          3rd floor, B-wing, R.C.Marg,
          Chembur (E) Mumbai.

 4.       The Regional Manager,
          Aurangabad Regional Office of
          Sahityaratna Lokshahir Annabhau Sathe
          Vikas Mahamandal (Marayadit),
          Regional Office Aurangabad.      ...  RESPONDENTS

                                .....
 Shri S.L.Bhapkar, Advocate for petitioner
 Mrs M.A.Deshpande, A.G.P. for State
 Shri P.P.Chavan, Advocate for respondents
 ____________________________________________________

                               CORAM:       ANOOP V. MOHTA AND
                                            SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATED: 7th June, 2017.

ORAL JUDGMENT (Per Anoop V. Mohta, J.)

WP/7437/2017

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard

finally by consent of learned counsel for the parties.

2. We are inclined to dispose of all these writ petitions

as similar points are agitated so also the grievances are basically

against impugned order dated 18.02.2017 / 28.04.2017. The

petitioners contend that, no show cause notice was given to them

prior to issuance of the impugned orders.

3. We are inclined to permit petitioners to make

representations to the concerned respondents within a period of

10 days. The respondents to deal with the same as early as

possible and preferably within a period of 2 weeks from the date

of receipt of the representations.

4. Considering the facts and the circumstances as also

the reasons recorded above, pending the decision on the

representations, we direct that no coercive steps be taken

against the petitioners based upon the impugned orders till the

communication of decision on their representations by the

concerned respondents to the petitioners. All points are kept

open.

WP/7437/2017

5. Petitions are accordingly disposed of with liberty to

the petitioners to challenge the decision if it is adverse. No costs.

          (SUNIL K. KOTWAL)                   (ANOOP V. MOHTA)
               JUDGE                               JUDGE


 vmk/





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter