Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mahadeo Dewaji Nagulkar (Dead) ... vs Nagpur Improvement Trust & ...
2017 Latest Caselaw 2788 Bom

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 2788 Bom
Judgement Date : 6 June, 2017

Bombay High Court
Mahadeo Dewaji Nagulkar (Dead) ... vs Nagpur Improvement Trust & ... on 6 June, 2017
Bench: Ravi K. Deshpande
                                                    1                                 Judg. wp 2412.93.odt 

                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY :
                              NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.

                                        Writ Petition No.2412 of 1993

              Mahadeo s/o Dewaji  Nagulkar,
              Aged about 60 years, Occ.-Household,
              R/o.-H.No.28, T.S. No.354,  
              Mangalwari, Azamshah Chowk, 
              Gagajamna Road, Cir. No.5/10, Nagpur.                 .... (Dead)
              (Legal heirs of the petitioner)

              1]       Anil s/o Mahadeo Nagulkar,                      (Amended as per  Court's
                       Aged about 40 years, Occ.-Service,            order dated 17-4-1995)

              2]       Pankaj s/o Mahadeo Nagulkar,
                       Aged about 20 years, Occ.-Nil,

              3]       Smt. Chandrakala w/o Prakash Pise,
                       Age Major, Occ.-Household,
                       R/.o-Siraspeth, Nagpur                                  .... (Dead)
                       (Legal heirs of petitioner no.3)

              3-A] Ku. Likhita d/o Prakash Pise,                   (Amended as per  Court's
                   Aged major, Occ-Nil,                                 order dated 11-08-2014)
                   R/o.-Juni Mangalwari, Nagpur.

              3-B] Sachin s/o Prakash Pise,
                   Aged major, Occ-Nil,
                   R/o.-Juni Mangalwari, Nagpur.

              4]         Smt. Laxmidevi w/o Devidas Bandre,       (Amended as per  Court's
                         R/o.-Dattawadi, Suraksha Nagar, Nagpur.  order dated 17-4-1995)
                                                                                                .... Petitioners.




       ::: Uploaded on - 09/06/2017                                          ::: Downloaded on - 10/06/2017 00:38:39 :::
                                                     2                                 Judg. wp 2412.93.odt 

                                                               -Versus-

              1]       Nagpur Improvement Trust,
                       through  its Chairman, Nagpur.

              2]       The Land Acquisition Officer,
                       for the Nagpur Improvement Trust, Nagpur.

              3]       Smt. Radhikabai w/o Tulsiram Akre,
                       Aged about 70 years, Occ.-Household Affairs,
                       R/o.-near Bus Stop, Ramtek, 
                       Tah. Ramtek, Distt. Nagpur.  

              4]       Smt. Gopikabai W/o Gajananrao Akre,
                       R/o.-Somwari Quarter, Nagpur.                         .... (Dead)
                       (Legal heirs of resp. no.4.)
              4-i]     Keshav s/o Gajanan Akhare,                     (Amended as per  Court's
                       Occ. Private,                                               order dated 29-07-2016)
                       (Correct address of  resp. no.4-i)
                       Keshao @  Kishore s/o Gajanan Akre,      (Amended as per  Registrar's
                       R/o.-Qtr. No.E, Type No.63,                       order dated 07-09-2016)
                       near Atta Chakki, Vidyut Vihar, 
                       Koradi Power House, Tah. and District Nagpur.

              4-ii]    Sunil s/o Gajanan Akhre,
                       Aged about 50 years,  Occ-Private Business
                       (Unsound Mind), 
                       through his wife Rekha Sunil Akhare (Caretaker),

              4-ii-a] Rekha w/o Sunil Akhare,
                      Aged about 42 years,
                      Occ.-Private Business,
                      R/o.-C/o.-Plot No.470, Nana Vitthal Wanjari, 
                      Deshpande Layout, Nagpur.




       ::: Uploaded on - 09/06/2017                                       ::: Downloaded on - 10/06/2017 00:38:39 :::
                                                     3                                 Judg. wp 2412.93.odt 

              4-iii] Mangla Giridhar Bhute,
                     Aged about 52 years, Occ.-Household,
                     All residents of near Power House 
                     beside Hanuman Mandir Subhash Lottery Centre, 
                     near Narsingh Talkies, Mahal, Nagpur.

              5]       Smt. Shakuntalabai w/o Manohar Akre,
                       Aged about 62 years, Occ.-Household Affairs,
                       R/o.-Anand Nagar, Nagpur.

              6]      Smt. Maltibai w/o Anandrao Akre,
                      Aged about 58 years, Occ.-Household Affairs,
                      R/o.-Kalamna Market, Nagpur.                     .... Respondents.
              -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              None for the petitioner.
              Shri V.P. Maldhure, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent no.2.
               -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Coram : R. K. Deshpande & 
                             Mrs. Swapna Joshi, JJ.
               Dated  : 06    June, 2017
                              th
                                           

              ORAL JUDGMENT (Per R. K. Deshpande, J.)

This petition claims the relief of directing the respondent

no.1 to allot Plot No.45 in his favour or to make rehousing

arrangement under Section 31 of the Nagpur Improvement Trust Act,

1936 [for short, "the said Act"] before evicting the petitioner from

the property in question.

2] It is not in dispute that the Nagpur Improvement Trust framed

a Central Avenue Road Scheme under Section 31 of the said Act and

4 Judg. wp 2412.93.odt

for that purpose a Notification was published in the Official Gazette

on 07-08-1958 for acquisition of land under Section 39 of the said

Act. A final declaration was made under Section 45 therein which

was published on 27-08-1963. The award was passed on 24-04-1973

in respect of the entire land admeasuring 3418 sq.ft. and the

compensation of Rs.18,950/- was awarded jointly to all the six

owners including the present petitioner. The petitioner applied for

abandonment of Plot No.45 from acquisition under Section 68(2) of

the said Act. The claim was rejected on 03-05-1982. The petitioner

filed Civil Suit No.1608 of 1982 for grant of declaration that he is

entitled for the allotment of Plot No.45. It was dismissed on

03-12-1984 and Regular Civil Appeal No.173 of 1985 was dismissed

on 08-05-1992. This Court also dismissed Second Appeal

No.457 of 1992. It is, in this background, thus, this petition is filed

for allotment of Plot No.45 by the petitioner.

3] The claim for abandonment of Plot No.45 from acquisition

made under Section 68(2) of the said Act was rejected and the

challenge to it in a Civil Suit has failed. This has attained the finality

up to this Court. In view of this, the present petition claiming the

same relief is liable to be dismissed on this short ground of bar of

resjudicata. Apart from this the stand of the respondent-Nagpur

Improvement Trust in the return filed is that the property was needed

5 Judg. wp 2412.93.odt

for implementation of Central Avenue Street Scheme and it has been

utilized in its entirety. Under the Scheme there is a widening of

Central Avenue Road and shopping complexes have been constructed

besides this widened road. According to the respondent-Nagpur

Improvement Trust the Scheme has been executed 100% and there is

no case made out for abandonment of Plot No.45. It is pertinent to

note that the property was jointly owned by the petitioner along

with his brothers and out of the land acquired for the purposes of the

said Street Scheme, Plot No.45A was alloted to the family of the

petitioner.

4] In view of the aforesaid position, we do not find any substance

in this petition. The same is therefore dismissed. No order as to

costs.

                                 JUDGE                                             JUDGE




              Deshmukh





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter