Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 5156 Bom
Judgement Date : 27 July, 2017
wp.1018.02
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 1018/2002
* Shri Salimuddin s/o Bafati Salmani
Aged about 52 years, o ccu: Service
R/o W.C.L. Bajaj Colony, Qr.No. 2/3
Saoner, Tah. Saoner, Dist. Nagpur. ..PETITIONER
VERSUS
1) State of Maharashtra
Through Collector, Nagpur
Collectorate, Civil Lines, Nagpur.
2) The Commissioner, Nagpur Division
Civil Lines, Nagpur.
3) The Chief General Manager,
Western Coalfields Ltd.
Civil Lines, Nagpur.
4) The Special Land Acquisition Officer
and Deputy Collector
Nagpur, Pench Project No.1
Tahsil Office, Civil Lines, Nagpur. ..RESPONDENTS
.
...................................................................................................................
Mr. R.A. Haq, Adv. for the petitioner
Mr. N.S. Rao, Asst. Government Pleader for respondent nos.1,2 & 4
Mr. S.C.Mehadia, Advocate for respondents-WCL
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE &
MRS.SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.
DATED : 27 th
July, 2017
ORAL JUDGMENT: (Per R.K.DESHPANDE, J.)
wp.1018.02
The petition claims the reliefs as under :-
"i) Pass appropriate writ, direction and order directing the respondent nos.1 and 2 to correct the concern revenue record of the field bearing S. No. 101/5 (old S. No. 75/10, 77/9) of Mouza Waghoda, Tah.Saoner, Dist. Nagpur, P.H. No.33, Area 0.11 H.R. Of the petitioner which is wrongly mutated in the name of W.C.L. Saoner and the same be shown in the name of the petitioner.
ii) Direct the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the field property of the petitioner bearing S.No. 101/5 (old No. 75/10, 77/9) of Mouza Waghoda, Tah.Saoner, Dist. Nagpur P.H. No.33, Area 0.11 H.R.
Iii) Grant any other relief to the petitioner deemed necessary by this Hon'ble Court in the circumstances of the case."
2. There is a dispute as to the title of the petitioner over the
land in question, the acquisition of the land by the State Government for
Western Coalfields Limited, the measurement of the land and the
possession. All these are the disputed questions of fact which cannot be
gone into in writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of
wp.1018.02
India. If the petitioner is the owner of the property, it is for him to move
the authorities under the provisions of the Maharashtra Land Revenue
Code for grant of appropriate relief which also contained the provisions
of appeal and revision. Apart from this, the petitioner has remedy of
filing civil suit to get such a controversy resolved.
3. We do not find any reason to grant relief to the petitioner in
this petition. The Writ Petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner
to approach all such authorities and forum, as is permissible in law.
JUDGE JUDGE sahare
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!