Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mahendra Sudhakar Nimje, Dist. ... vs State Of Mah.Dept. Of Tribal ...
2017 Latest Caselaw 5078 Bom

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 5078 Bom
Judgement Date : 26 July, 2017

Bombay High Court
Mahendra Sudhakar Nimje, Dist. ... vs State Of Mah.Dept. Of Tribal ... on 26 July, 2017
Bench: Ravi K. Deshpande
                                                  1              wp1097.02.odt

                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                         NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

                          WRIT PETITION NO. 1097 OF 2002

            Mahendra Sudhakar Nimje,
            aged about 25 years, Occ. Service,
            R/o. Mowad, Tq. Narkhd, Distt. Nagpur ..                       PETITIONER

                                 ...VERSUS...

 1.         State of Maharashtra,
            Department of Tribal Development,
            through its Principal-Secretary,
            Mantralaya, Mumbai.

 2.         The Chairman,
            Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate
            Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur,
            Adiwasi Vikas Bhavan, Giripeth,
            Amravati Road, Nagpur.

 3.         Education Officer (Primary),
            Zilla Parishad, Nagpur.

 4.         The Block Education Officer,
            Panchayat Samiti, Katol,
            Tah. Katol, Distt.Nagpur.

 5.      State of Maharashtra,
         Department of General Administration,
         through its Principal Secretary,
         Mantralaya, Mumbai                        ......            RESPONDENTS
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Shri A.R.Patil, counsel for Petitioner.
 Shri S.M.Ukey, Addl. Govt. Pleader for Respondents
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                          CORAM: R. K. DESHPANDE, AND
                                        Mrs. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.

th DATE : 26 JULY, 2017 .

                                                  2             wp1097.02.odt

 ORAL JUDGMENT (P.C.)


          1]               The   petitioner   was   employed   on   the   post   of

Assistant Teacher in the services of the Zilla Parishad,

Nagpur, against a post reserved for Scheduled Tribe

category. The petitioner claims that he belongs to Halba/

Halbi-Scheduled Tribe, which is an entry at Sr.No.19 of

Constitution (Scheduled Tribe) Order, 1950, and on the basis

of caste certificate dated 28.07.1993, he was granted an

employment.

2] Upon scrutiny and verification of the caste claim

of the petitioner by the Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate

Scrutiny Committee at Nagpur, the claim of the petitioner for

Halba - Scheduled Tribe was rejected by an order dated

09.11.2001, which is the subject matter of challenge in this

petition. During the pendency of the petition, petitioner's

service was protected.

3] Shri Arun Patil, the learned counsel appearing

for the petitioner invited our attention to the additional

affidavit filed in this Court on 17.07.2017 along with which the

3 wp1097.02.odt

document in which the entry of the petitioner's grand father

dated 23.09.1920 is shown to be of 'Halbi'. This document

was not produced before the Committee. The documents

produced before the Committee include the Primary School

Leaving Certificate in the name of the petitioner's father in

which the caste is shown as 'Halbi' on 25.06.1951. The

matter can, therefore, be remanded back to the Committee

for scrutiny and verification afresh after granting the petitioner

an opportunity to produce the document on record.

4] In the result, writ petition is allowed. The order

dated 09.11.2011 passed by the Scheduled Tribe Caste

Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur, is hereby quashed

and set aside. The matter is remitted back to the said

Committee for enquiry afresh through Police Vigilance Cell

after giving an opportunity to the petitioner to produce all

such documents as are available with him in support of his

claim for Halba/Halbi- Scheduled Tribe category. The

petitioner to appear before the said Committee on

29.08.2017. The Committee to decide the tribe claim of he

petitioner within a period of six months thereafter.

4 wp1097.02.odt

Rule is made absolute in these term. No order as

to costs.

                                JUDGE                      JUDGE
 Rvjalit





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter