Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 4837 Bom
Judgement Date : 20 July, 2017
WP/235/2009
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
922 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.235 OF 2009
Rakesh Dattatraya Dhawde,
Age 43 years, Occu. Business,
R/o Flat No.3, Manini Apartments,
Last Bus Stop of Dhayari Gaon,
Pune. ... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Maharashtra,
Through Superintendent of Police,
Nanded, Dist. Nanded.
2. Police Inspector,
Bhagyanagar Police Station,
Nanded.
3. The Superintendent of Police,
Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI),
Nagpur. ... Respondents
WITH
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.238 OF 2009
Rakesh Dattatraya Dhawde,
Age 43 years, Occu. Business,
R/o Flat No.3, Manini Apartments,
Last Bus Stop of Dhayari Gaon,
Pune. ... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Maharashtra,
Through Superintendent of Police,
Jalna, Dist. Jalna.
2. Police Inspector,
Sadar Bazar Police Station,
Jalna.
3. Police Inspector Local Crime Branch,
Jalna, District Jalna. ... Respondents
::: Uploaded on - 25/07/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 08/08/2017 00:44:46 :::
WP/235/2009
2
...
Mr. S.W.Munde, AGP for State/Respondent Nos.1 & 2
...
CORAM : T.V.NALAWADE, AND
SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.
DATED : 20th July, 2017
ORAL JUDGMENT (Per Shri. T.V.Nalawade, J.) :-
1. Both the proceedings are filed for challenging the orders
made by the learned Judicial Magistrate (First Class), Nanded and
learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jalna and also the decision given by
the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jalna in Criminal Revision
No.19/2009. The Court has allowed the application made by the
investigating agencies to conduct the Narco Analysis Test of the
petitioners. Nobody turned up for petitioners. In view of the law
settled, on this point learned APP is heard.
2. In the case reported in Selvi and others Vs. State of
Karnataka [(2010) 3 SCC 558], the Hon'ble Supreme Court has laid
down that, the test of aforesaid nature affect the privacy of the persons
and further such test cannot be allowed against the accused persons as
it also violates the right given under Article 20(3) and Article 21 of
Constitution of India.
WP/235/2009
3. In view of the settled position of law, this Court holds
that, the petitions deserve to be allowed. Both the petitions are
allowed. The orders made by Judicial Magistrate (First Class),
Nanded and Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jalna, which are challenged in
this petition are quashed and set aside. Order passed by the Additional
District & Sessions Judge, Jalna is also quashed and set aside. The
revision is allowed for giving the relief to the accused persons.
4. Rule made absolute in these terms in both the
proceedings.
(SUNIL K. KOTWAL, J.) (T.V.NALAWADE, J.)
...
vmk
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!