Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 4693 Bom
Judgement Date : 18 July, 2017
1 wp3529.04.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 3529 OF 2004
Smt. Ushatai Ishwar Kolhe,
aged about 39 years, Occ. Councilor,
R/o. At & Post Khapa, Ward No.5,
Tah. Saoner, Distt. Nagpur . ......PETITIONER
...VERSUS...
1. State of Maharashtra,
Through Secretary, Tribal Development
Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32.
2. Scheduled Tribes Caste Certificate
Scrutiny Committee, Adivasi Vikas
Bhavan, Giripeth, Nagpur.
3. The Collector,
Office of the Collector,
Civil Lines, Nagpur.
4. State Election Commissioner,
1st Floor, Admn Building, Opp.
Mantralaya, Govt. of Maharashtra
Mumbai.
5. Smt. Mayadevi Ankushrao Parteti,
aged 40 years, Occ. Social Worker,
R/o. Ward No. 11, Tah. Saoner,
Distt. Nagpur RESPONDENTS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
None for Petitioner.
Shri V.P.Maldhure, Asstt.. Govt. Pleader for Respondents 1 to 4
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM: R. K. DESHPANDE, AND
Mrs. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.
th DATE : 18 JULY, 2017 .
2 wp3529.04.odt
ORAL JUDGMENT (Per DESHPANDE, J)
1] The claim for Halba - Scheduled Tribe category
made by the petitioner before the Scheduled Tribe Caste
Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur, was rejected by an
order dated 26.07.2004, which is the subject matter of
challenge in this petition. The petitioner contested the
election against the seat reserved for Scheduled Tribe
category.
2] None appears for the petitioner. With the
assistance of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, we
have gone through the order passed by the Scrutiny
Committee. We find that except two documents of 1989 and
1970, no other documents are placed on record to establish
the claim for Halba - Scheduled Tribe category. The Police
Vigilance Cell submitted its report on 29.11.2003 and it is
found that the caste of the candidate is recorded as 'Koshti
(Halba) in the Primary School Leaving Certificate. The
Committee has relied upon the affinity test, which the
petitioner has failed to satisfy. The view taken by the
Committee appears to be a possible view of the matter,
3 wp3529.04.odt
which does not give rise to any substantial question. The writ
petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.
JUDGE JUDGE Rvjalit
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!