Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 4672 Bom
Judgement Date : 18 July, 2017
1 wp3137.02.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 3137 OF 2002
Ku. Pragati Pandurang Bhanuse,
aged about 17 years, Occ. Student,
R/o. Juni Mangalwari, Jagannath Swami
Chowk, Rampeth, Nagpur ...... PETITIONER
...VERSUS...
1. The State of Maharashtra,
through its Secretary,
Tribal Development Department
Mantralaya, Mumbai-400 032.
2. Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate
Verification Committee, Adiwasi
Vikas Bhavan, Giripeth, Nagpur.
3. The Head Master, Pandit Bachchharaj
Vyas High School & Junior College,
Nagpur. RESPONDENTS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
None for Petitioner.
Shri V.P.Maldhure, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for Respondents 1 and 2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM: R. K. DESHPANDE, AND
Mrs. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.
th DATE : 18 JULY, 2017 .
ORAL JUDGMENT (Per DESHPANDE, J)
1] The caste claim of the petitioner for Halba -
Scheduled Tribe category was rejected by the Scheduled
Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, as per the order
dated 17.06.2002, which is the subject matter of challenge in
2 wp3137.02.odt
this petition.
2] None appears for the petitioner. Heard learned
Assistant Government Pleader appearing for respondent
Nos. 1 and 2.
3] We have gone through the order passed by the
Scrutiny Committee. The Committee has considered 16
documents placed on record by the petitioner. It has also
considered the documents obtained by the Police Vigilance
Cell, which indicate that the caste of the student's parental
grand mother, parental aunt, cousin parental aunt and cousin
parental uncle is recorded as 'Koshti'. The document of
parental grand mother is of 24.02.1929. The Committee has
applied affinity test and coupled with the documents, the
finding is recorded that the caste claim for Halba -
Scheduled Tribe has not been established. The view taken
by the Committee is a possible view of the matter, which
does not call for any interference. The writ petition is
dismissed. No order as to costs.
JUDGE JUDGE Rvjalit
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!