Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shanti Krushi Seva Kendra Thr. ... vs The Vidarbha Cooperative ...
2017 Latest Caselaw 4667 Bom

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 4667 Bom
Judgement Date : 18 July, 2017

Bombay High Court
Shanti Krushi Seva Kendra Thr. ... vs The Vidarbha Cooperative ... on 18 July, 2017
Bench: V.M. Deshpande
Judgment



                                                                    apl776.16 18

                                       1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
           NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

        CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.776 OF 2016

Shanti Krushi Seva Kendra through
its Proprietor Pravin s/o Vasantrao 
Dhone, age 39 years, Occupation
Business, R/o Malipura, Alegaon,
Taluka Patur, District Akola.                            ..... Applicant.

                                ::   VERSUS   ::

1.  The Vidarbha Co-operative
Marketing Society Limited, Nagpur
branch, Akola Through its District
Marketing Manager Shri R.R.
Mungona, Aged adult, Occupation
business, r/o Opposite Shivaji College,
Akola, Taluka and District Akola.

2. State of Maharashtra,
Through D.G.P. Akola,
Taluka and District Akola.                          ..... Non-applicants.

================================================================
           Shri S.A. Mohta, Counsel for the applicant.
           Shri N.R. Tekade, Counsel for non-applicant No.1.
           Shri I.J. Damle, Addl.P.P. for non-applicant No.2/State.
================================================================




                                                                          .....2/-



 ::: Uploaded on - 18/07/2017                       ::: Downloaded on - 20/07/2017 00:24:36 :::
 Judgment



                                                                   apl776.16 18

                                     2

                                CORAM : V.M. DESHPANDE, J.
                                DATE    : JULY 18, 2017.



ORAL JUDGMENT

1.              Rule.   Rule is made returnable forthwith.   Heard

finally   by   consent   of   learned   counsel   appearing   for   the

parties.


2.              The   present   application   is   filed   by   original

accused.     Non-applicant   No.1   is   original   complainant.     A

proceeding   for   the   offence   punishable   under   Section   138   of

the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 was initiated against the

present   applicant   vide   Summary   Criminal   Case   No.3386   of

2004   before   learned   Judicial   Magistrate   First   Class,   Court

No.3 at Akola.   Vide judgment and order of conviction dated

17.9.2016, learned Magistrate convicted the present applicant

and directed that he should suffer simple imprisonment for 6



                                                                         .....3/-



  ::: Uploaded on - 18/07/2017                     ::: Downloaded on - 20/07/2017 00:24:36 :::
 Judgment



                                                                     apl776.16 18

                                      3

months   and   also   directed   to   pay   Rs.4,00,000/-   towards

compensation.


3.              The applicant feeling aggrieved thereby, preferred

an appeal before learned Sessions Judge at Akola.   The said

criminal   appeal   came   to   be   registered   as   Criminal   Appeal

No.150   of   2016.     In   the   said   appeal,   an   application   for

suspension of substantive jail sentence and for grant of bail

was   filed.     The   said   application   is   at   Exhibit   5.     Learned

Additional Sessions Judge at Akola on 15.10.2016 allowed the

said   application   on   a   condition   that   the   applicant   should

deposit cheque amount of Rs.3,23,772-10 till next date.


4.              Learned counsel Shri S.A. Mohta for the applicant

submits that the applicant  has  already deposited  amount of

Rs.5,000/- on 17.9.2016; amount of Rs.75,000/- on 3.1.2017,  and

amount   of   Rs.81,886   on   13.1.2017.     Thus,   total   amount   of


                                                                           .....4/-



  ::: Uploaded on - 18/07/2017                       ::: Downloaded on - 20/07/2017 00:24:36 :::
 Judgment



                                                                     apl776.16 18

                                       4

Rs.1,161,886/- is deposited by the present applicant.   Learned

counsel has handed over 3 receipts.  Those three receipts are

taken on record and marked as "Annexure X" for the purposes

of identification.


5.              The   applicant   has   challenged   order   dated

15.10.2016   passed   by   learned   Additional   Sessions   at   Akola

before this Court.


6.              The   complainant   has   an   every   right   to   prefer   a

statutory   appeal.     The   applicant   has   preferred   the   said

statutory appeal.    The said appeal is yet not decided and is

pending   on   the   file   of   the   Lower   Appellate   Court.     Thus,

conviction is not yet attained its finality.   The applicant has

already   shown   his  bona   fide  by   depositing   amount   of

Rs.1,161,886/-.


7.              In that view of the matter, this is a fit case wherein

                                                                           .....5/-



  ::: Uploaded on - 18/07/2017                       ::: Downloaded on - 20/07/2017 00:24:36 :::
 Judgment



                                                                      apl776.16 18

                                       5

the   Court   should   exercise   its   inherent   jurisdiction   under

Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in favour of the

present applicant.  Hence, I pass the following order:


                                   ORDER

i) The criminal application is allowed.

ii) Order dated 15.10.2016, passed by learned

Additional Sessions Judge at Akola below

Exhibit-5 in Criminal Appeal N0.150 of 216, is

modified.

iii) The applicant be released on bail on he

executive a P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/-

(rupees fifteen thousand only) with one solvent

surety in the like amount.

iv) Amount deposited of Rs.1,161,886/- shall be

.....6/-

Judgment

apl776.16 18

invested by the Court below in any Nationalized

Bank so as to save loss of interest.

The criminal application is partly allowed and

disposed of.

JUDGE

!! BRW !!

...../-

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter