Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 4664 Bom
Judgement Date : 18 July, 2017
1 wp3473.00.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 3473 OF 2000
Dr. Shamkant Narayan Nandanwar,
aged about 28 years,
R/o. Nandanwar Bandhu Bhavan,
Indira Gandhi Ward, Bhandara,
Tah. And Distt. Bhandara ...... PETITIONER
...VERSUS...
1. The State of Maharashtra,
through its Secretary,
Department of Agriculture,
Animal Husbandry, Dairy Development
& Fisheries, Mantralaya, "Vistar
Bhavan", Mumbai-400 032.
2. The Scheduled Tribe Caste Scrutiny
Committee, Nagpur ...... RESPONDENTS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
None for Petitioner.
Shri V.P.Maldhure, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for Respondents
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM: R. K. DESHPANDE, AND
Mrs. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.
th DATE : 18 JULY, 2017 .
ORAL JUDGMENT (Per DESHPANDE, J)
1] None appears for the petitioner. Heard Shri
Maldhure, the learned Assistant Government Pleader
appearing for the respondents.
2 wp3473.00.odt
2] The petitioner was selected for the post of
Animal Husbandry Development Officer under the State
Government through Maharashtra Public Service
Commission. However, he was not granted an order of
appointment, as the caste validity certificate was not
produced. The claim of the petitioner was referred to the said
Committee for verification and by an order dated 15.03.2000,
the Committee has invalidated the caste claim of the
petitioner and the caste certificate dated 19.08.1988 has
been cancelled.
3] The claim of the petitioner was for Halba -
Scheduled Tribe category. From the order impugned, it
seems that the petitioner has avoided to submit original caste
certificate and he has also failed to cooperate with the
Committee for disposal of the matter in accordance with the
procedure prescribed. The Committee has also recorded the
finding, holding that the caste of the father of the petitioner is
shown as 'Koshti'. However, in the petition, it is the averment
that the documents prior to 1950 are available with the
petitioner showing the caste as 'Halba - Scheduled Tribe'.
3 wp3473.00.odt
4] In view of the aforesaid position, we grant the
petitioner one more chance to appear before the Committee
to establish his claim for Halba - Scheduled Tribe Category.
We, therefore, allow this petition by setting aside the order
and directing the Committee to decide the claim afresh.
5] In the result, writ petition is allowed. The order
dated 15.03.2000 passed by the Committee is hereby
quashed and set aside. The matter is remitted back to the
said Committee for decision afresh in accordance with law.
The petitioner is directed to submit the original caste
certificate before the said Committee for verification and
scrutiny, failing which the Committee shall pass an order
rejecting the caste claim only on that ground.
Rule is made absolute in above terms. No order
as to costs.
JUDGE JUDGE Rvjalit
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!