Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kamala Jagannath Chimangaonkar vs Rayat Shikshan Sanstha And Ors
2017 Latest Caselaw 4435 Bom

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 4435 Bom
Judgement Date : 13 July, 2017

Bombay High Court
Kamala Jagannath Chimangaonkar vs Rayat Shikshan Sanstha And Ors on 13 July, 2017
Bench: A.A. Sayed
                                                                    wp 7611-03.doc

DDR

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                              CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                            WRIT PETITION NO.7611 OF 2003


       Mrs. Kamal Jagannath Chimangaonkar
       Age : 58 years, Occ. : Service,
       residing at "Shrihari Niwas", 221-A, 
       Guruwar Peth, Satara City - 415 002.               ...Petitioner

                           VERSUS

       1. Rayat Shikshan Sanstha,
       at Powai Naka, Post Tal.
       and Dist. Satara.
       (Through the Secretary)


       2. The Head Master,
       Karmaveer Bhaurao Patil Vidyalaya
       At and Post : Bhuinj, Tal. Wai, Dist. Satara.

       3. State of Maharashtra
       through the Deputy Director of
       Education, Kolhapur

       4. Education Officer (Secondary)
       Zilla Parishad, Satara.                            ...Respondents



       Ms. Devyani Kulkarni, Advocate appointed by Court for 
       Petitioner-in-person.




                                                                                   1/6



      ::: Uploaded on - 13/07/2017                ::: Downloaded on - 15/07/2017 00:37:35 :::
                                                                          wp 7611-03.doc

                                   CORAM                         : A.A.SAYED AND
                                                                    M.S.KARNIK, JJ.
                                               
                                   RESERVED ON       :  6th JULY 2017

                                  PRONOUNCED ON  : 13th JULY 2017 


 ORDER  (PER M.S. KARNIK, J.) :-

                  The   petitioner-Assistant   Teacher   who   was   working 

 with the school run by Respondent no.1-Management has filed 

 this petition for grant of B.Ed. Scale with effect from the date 

 when the petitioner became eligible for such scale.



 2.               The petitioner was appointed as an Assistant Teacher 

 w.e.f. 1st July 1974. In 1977, the petitioner obtained B.A. Degree. 

 It is the case of the petitioner that during 1974-1994, she was 

 transferred eight times. On 4th Jun, 1981, a letter was written by 

 the   respondent-Management   stating   that   the   petitioner   is 

 eligible for the promotion to B.Ed. Scale. By the Memo dated 

 27/7/1981   the   respondent-   Management   decided   to   promote 

 the   petitioner   to   the   B.Ed.   Scale   of   Rs.365-15-500-20-660-

 Extn.20-760   w.e.f.   1/8/1981.   On   5 th  September,   1981, 



                                                                                        2/6



::: Uploaded on - 13/07/2017                           ::: Downloaded on - 15/07/2017 00:37:35 :::
                                                                     wp 7611-03.doc

 Educational Officer granted approval w.e.f. 7th  September 1981 

 for  the  promotion of the  petitioner from D.Ed. Scale  to B.Ed. 

 Scale.   On   1st  September,   1982   the   petitioner   was   transferred 

 from   Manchar,   District   Pune   to   Mahatma   Gandhi   Vidyalay, 

 Pachavad,   Taluka-   Wai,   District   -   Satara.   From   1st  September 

 1982 the petitioner started receiving salary in the D.Ed. Scale 

 again and not in B.Ed. Scale. On 30 th December, 1989, she was 

 transferred to New English School, Vaduth, Taluka and District 

 Satara.   On   30th  December,   1989   the   petitioner   made 

 representation requesting that she may be granted salary as per 

 B.Ed. Scale. 



 3.               The petitioner obtained B.Ed. Degree in 1994. From 

 1st  October,   1994,   the   petitioner   was   not   allowed   to   resume 

 duties   and   therefore,   she   filed   an   Appeal   before   the   School 

 Tribunal. The School Tribunal was pleased to allow the Appeal 

 No.2/1995   vide   order   dated   23/4/2001   and   granted 

 reinstatement with full backwages from 1st October, 1994  upto 

 30/8/1997   and   at   the   rate   of   25%   of   the   backwages   for   the 



                                                                                   3/6



::: Uploaded on - 13/07/2017                      ::: Downloaded on - 15/07/2017 00:37:35 :::
                                                                    wp 7611-03.doc

 subsequent period i.e. from 1/9/1997 till her reinstatement. 



 4.               It  is  the  petitioner's case  that she  was granted the 

 B.Ed. Scale on 4th June, 1981 and paid accordingly for one year. 

 The respondents are not justified in then paying her in the D.Ed. 

 Scale. The petitioner therefore prays that she may be paid as per 

 B.Ed. Scale. 



 5.               The   respondent-   Management   denied   the   claim   of 

 the petitioner. According to the Management, in 1982 when she 

 was  transferred  to Mahatma  Gandhi Vidyalaya,  District-Satara 

 there   was  no   vacancy   of   the   Assistant   Teacher   in   B.Ed.  Scale 

 therefore the respondent was justified in paying her as per D.Ed. 

 Scale. In so far as grant of the B.Ed. Scale is concerned, they 

 have already submitted a proposal on 20th October 2001 to the 

 Education Officer. In the said proposal it is pointed out that one 

 Shri Pisal was promoted w.e.f. 1st  January 1994 and therefore 

 there is one vacancy in the B.Ed. Scale. A proposal was therefore 

 submitted to pay to the petitioner in B.Ed. Scale. 



                                                                                  4/6



::: Uploaded on - 13/07/2017                     ::: Downloaded on - 15/07/2017 00:37:35 :::
                                                                      wp 7611-03.doc

 6.               When the Petition came up for hearing we inquired 

 about status of the proposal which is submitted. It was pointed 

 out by the learned Counsel for the Management that there are 

 some deficiencies in the proposal and the petitioner has not co-

 operated as a result the proposal was returned back. 



 7.               The petitioner has prayed that she may be granted 

 B.Ed.   Scale   from   1982.   We   are   not   inclined   to   entertain   this 

 request as the petitioner has not taken any steps and for a long 

 time did not make any grievance about non payment of B.Ed. 

 Scale from 1983.



 8.               It appears that the petitioner was transferred at her 

 request and she was accommodated at her husband's place of 

 posting. However, as the petitioner has obtained B.Ed. Degree 

 from 1994 her case for grant of B.Ed. Scale as per the proposal 

 of   the   Management   from   12/2/1994   is   required   to   be 

 considered in the interest of justice. Hence in our opinion the 

 following order will meet the ends of justice.



                                                                                    5/6



::: Uploaded on - 13/07/2017                       ::: Downloaded on - 15/07/2017 00:37:35 :::
                                                                       wp 7611-03.doc

                                      ORDER

1. The Management to submit a fresh proposal in respect of the Petitioner duly completed for the grant of B.Ed. Scale w.e.f. 12/02/1994 to the Educational Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad, Satara, within a period of 4 weeks from today. The Petitioner to co-operate with the Respondents.

2. The Education Officer may take a decision on the said proposal within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt thereof on its own merits.

3. On approval of the proposal the arrears of the salary may be paid to the petitioner within a period of eight weeks from the date of the order.

4. The Petition is disposed of. Rule made absolute on the above terms.

9. In this matter we had requested Ms. Devayani

Kulkarni, learned Counsel to assist us on behalf of the Petitioner

as the Petitioner was not in a position to engage a Lawyer. She

has graciously accepted our request. We place on record our

appreciation for the able assistance rendered by Learned

Counsel Ms. Devayani Kulkarni in this matter.

 (M.S.KARNIK, J.)                                               (A.A.SAYED, J.)






 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter