Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 4297 Bom
Judgement Date : 11 July, 2017
* 1/8 * 902-PILST-65-2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (L) NO.65 OF 2017
Dr. Kanagasabapathy Sundaram Pillai
Founder, MY "Integrating Society
India Net" NGGO,
Shop No.1 and 2, Kantharia Mansion,
C.S.312, Dharavi Cross Road,
Dharavi, Mumbai 400017 ......Petitioner
Versus
Union Govt. of India,
Through,
The Chairman,
Central Board of Excise and
Customs "CBEC",
New Delhi 110001 .......Respondent
Petitioner present in person.
Mr. Anil C. Singh, Addl. Solicitor General with Mr. P.S.Jetly,
Mr. Sham V. Walve and Ms. Geetika Gandhi, Advocates for
Respondent.
CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, &
SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.
RESERVED ON : June 29, 2017.
PRONOUNCED ON: July 11, 2017.
JUDGMENT [Per Shri Sandeep K. Shinde, J.] :
The decision of respondent to implement Goods
and Services Tax ('GST' for short) with effect from Shivgan
* 2/8 * 902-PILST-65-2017.doc
1.7.2017 is subject matter of challenge in this petition on
the following grounds:
(i) That implementation is without
parliamentary sanction and
implementation in midst of the financial
year, is not valid;
(ii) That the preparations are not well to
adopt the new system as the rates of
CGST done recently just a week back for
which many representation from the public
are not yet replied/rectified;
(iii) That the States / UTs many are not
yet decided, not made laws and not
declared their proposed rates, not
prepared well for smooth implementations;
(iv) That the compensation for the first
quarter of the financial year not paid apart
from the arrears of many
aids/schemes/sharing and the states & UTs
will become financially critical and
unstable.
Shivgan
* 3/8 * 902-PILST-65-2017.doc
The petitioner has expressed his concerns
in the matter of implementation of acts
and extent of implementation of SGST in
its model form across the country by
States and Union Territories.
Petitioner expressed the doubt as to whether Acts
in their current form will be effective in reducing the
regulatory and administrative hurdles.
He, therefore, submitted that in the
circumstances it is advisable to make an automatic
software interfaced with the Trade Tax Automated Bank
Account (TTABA) and suggested such other measures for
effective implementation of GST.
Petitioner, thus, prayed that implementation of
GST be deferred till all legal flaws are removed, and/or till
full decision of final rates for all items including State
surcharge items preparation is done by all India states and
Union Territories.
2 The petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:
Shivgan
* 4/8 * 902-PILST-65-2017.doc
(a) Direct the respondent to defer the implementation till
the legal sanction for implementation, the decided rates on
all varied commodities etc. is taken from the parliament in
Budget session of 2018 in February, 2018 for initiation of
the new proposal from 1st April, 2018;
(b) Direction to utilize the period for the action on anti
profiteering laws and on all shell companies, illegal
duplicate manufacturing companies, unlawful commercial
activities for tax evading/money laundering etc by the
records of existing tax system thus preventing escape of
those by the pretext in change records in new tax system;
(c) To give publicity of all procedure to make the
traders familiar and they can be given facilities of
softwares interfaced with the trade account as per the Tax
registration and the licences given for trades & awareness
education of public by our NGGO trained Senior citizen
volunteers from 2001 census family based as "GST
Personal Assistant (GSTPA)" (as in case of Direct Tax "TPA")
at the cost of traders be posted. This will create 50 crore 4-
workhours part time volunteers from 2001 census family
based under EGS to prevent financial irregularities and help
Shivgan
* 5/8 * 902-PILST-65-2017.doc
to achieve less cash/cashless society;
(d) Directing to insist get a dedicated Trade-Bank-Account,
KYC based on valid trade licences only not by registration
certificates or individual basis for trade.
(e ) Education for awareness and informations as to be
provided by periodically in medias especially now regarding
the new tax system.
3 That to ensure implementation of 101 st
Amendment to the Constitution of India, the following 4
(Four) Acts were enacted:
(I) The Central Goods and Services Tax Act,
2017.
(ii) The Integrated Goods and Services Tax
Act, 2017.
(iii) The Goods and Services Tax
(Compensation to States) Act, 2017.
(iv) The Union Territory Goods and Services
Tax Act, 2017 and received presidential
assent on 6.4.2017.
In view of the fact aforesaid, contention of the
petitioner that decision to implement the aforesaid Acts Shivgan
* 6/8 * 902-PILST-65-2017.doc
from 1.7.2017 is without authority of law lacks substance.
In fact, herein levy and collection of taxes has sanction of
law in terms of Article 265 of the Constitution of India.
4 As against this, the learned ASG appearing for
the Union of India submitted thus:
(i) Thirty State legislatures have passed the State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
(ii) Necessary rules have been framed and notified.
(iii) Over 65 lakh taxpayers have already migrated to GST network and obtained registrations.
(iv) Rates of taxes have been notified.
(v) GST Seva Kendras have been set up at every Commissionerate, Division and Range. They are answering all questions of the tax payers, and will continue to do so. A Nodal Officer has been designated at each Kendra for this purpose. States are following similar procedure.
(vi) Administrative machinery is in place. Officers of the Central Excise, Service Tax and States Value Added Tax will be implementing GST.
(vii) Everything is now put on the Public Domain.
Shivgan
* 7/8 * 902-PILST-65-2017.doc
(viii) 60,000 officers in Central and State Governments have been trained in GST Law. The facts narrated by the learned ASG thus, indicate that respondents have taken all steps to implement New Tax System including to bring awareness amongst citizens.
5 We have perused the petition and the written
submissions submitted by the learned ASG. In our view,
petitioner cannot urge and/or seek directions to the
respondents to postpone the decision to implement GST
with effect from 1.7.2017, for simple reason that herein
levy and collection of taxes on goods and services has
sanction of law. That from written submission, it is much
evident that all such necessary steps are taken by the
respondents to ensure implementation of the GST, as it
appears (i) over 65 Lakhs tax-payers have already
migrated to GST network and obtained registrations, (ii) the
rates and taxes have been notified; (iii) rules have been
framed and notified ; (iv) wide publicity is given in public
domain; (v) entire machinery has been geared up not only
to accept new challenge but to ensure GST is implemented
Shivgan
* 8/8 * 902-PILST-65-2017.doc
effectively.
6 In view of these facts, we are not inclined to
entertain PIL and the same is dismissed.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J)
Shivgan
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!