Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 4194 Bom
Judgement Date : 7 July, 2017
0707FCA251.14-Judgment 1/2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 251 OF 2014
APPELLANT :- Laxman s/o Kirshnarao Dhakate, Age 50
years, Occ. Service, R/o Plot No.21, Behind
Jettewar Mangal Karyalaya, Ishwar Nagar,
Nagpur.
...VERSUS...
RESPONDENT :- Subhadra Laxman Dhakate, Aged 48 years,
Occ. Not Known, Juni Basti Tanda Peth
Ward No.39, Nagpur.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. S.A.Marathe, counsel for the appellant.
Mr.S.A.Chaudhari, counsel for the respondent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK &
ARUN D. UPADHYE
, JJ.
DATED : 07.07.2017
O R A L J U D G M E N T (Per Smt.Vasanti A Naik, J.)
The learned counsel for the parties have tendered a compromise
pursis in the court today. The same is accepted on record and marked as
exhibit-Z.
The compromise pursis is signed by the appellant and the respondent
and the counsel for the appellant and the counsel for the respondent.
0707FCA251.14-Judgment 2/2
It is stated in the compromise pursis that the marriage between the
parties should be dissolved as the respondent wife has agreed to accept a sum
of Rs.6,50,000/- as full and final settlement towards maintenance for past,
present and future. The appellant has handed over a cheque of Rs.3,00,000/-
dated 07/07/2017 to the wife in the court today. A second cheque dated
08/08/2017 for a sum of Rs.3,50,000/- as mentioned in the compromise
pursis is also handed over to the wife in the court today.
The parties are personally present in the court today. The
respondent-wife has acknowledged the receipt of the two cheques that are
mentioned in clause-5 of the compromise pursis.
When a query is made to the parties where they agree on the terms
and conditions mentioned in the compromise pursis, they have answered in
the affirmative and have stated that they are ad idem on the terms mentioned
in the compromise pursis.
In view of the aforesaid, the marriage solemnized between the
parties on 31/01/1992 is dissolved by a decree of divorce on the terms
mentioned in the compromise pursis at exhibit-Z. A decree be drawn
accordingly.
JUDGE JUDGE KHUNTE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!