Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 6494 Bom
Judgement Date : 23 August, 2017
J-fa985.17.odt 1/3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
FIRST APPEAL No.985 OF 2017
Pralhad s/o. Dhondba Tayade,
(dead), through legal heirs.
1. Vijay Pralhad Tayade,
Aged 54 years, Occupation : Service.
2. Vilas Pralhad Tayade,
Aged 56 years,
Occupation : Agriculturist,
R/o. Digras, Tah. Digras, Distt. Yavatmal. : APPELLANTS
...VERSUS...
1. The State of Maharashtra.
2. The Collector, Yavatmal.
3. Special Land Acquisition Officer,
M.I.W. No.2, Arunawati Project, Digras,
Tq. Digras, Distt. Yavatmal. : RESPONDENTS
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Shri R.J. Shinde, Advocate for the Appellants.
Shri A.M. Kadukar, Asstt. Government Pleader for the Respondents.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
CORAM : S.B. SHUKRE, J.
rd DATE : 23 AUGUST, 2017.
ORAL JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.G.P.
for the respondents.
J-fa985.17.odt 2/3
2. Admit. Heard finally by consent.
3. There is no need to call for record and proceedings as the
issue involved in this appeal is squarely covered by the judgments of this
Court in Civil Application (F) No.2830/2016 with First Appeal St.
No.20562/2015.
4. The land of the appellants was acquired for the purposes of
Arunavati Irrigation Project which was admeasuring 1 hectare 62 HR
along with Well situated at village Kalsa, District Yavatmal. The acquired
land was fully irrigated one. The Reference Court by its judgment and
order dated 15.2.1990 determined the market value of the irrigated land
to be at Rs.35,000/- and thus partly allowed the reference under Section
18 of the Land Acquisition Act. In Civil Application (F) No.2830/2016
with First Appeal St. No.20562/2015, decided on 1 st February, 2017, this
Court found that the rate of the land from the same area, which is
irrigated one, should have been of Rs.1,30,000/-.
5. In the present case, the acquired land is similarly situated as
the land is involved in Civil Application (F) No.2830/2016 with First
Appeal St. No.20562/2015 decided on 1 st February, 2017 (irrigated one).
There is no dispute about this fact. Therefore, I am of the view that even
for the acquired land in the instant case, same rates as were determined
by this Court in the above referred appeal, would have to be fixed for
giving just and proper compensation.
J-fa985.17.odt 3/3
6. In the circumstances, I find that the market value of the
acquired land in the present case is of Rs.1,30,000/- per hectare, it being
fully irrigated and accordingly the compensation deserves to be given at
this rate to the appellants and it is so given.
7. The appellants would also be entitled to receive other
benefits regarding interest, solatium etc. at the same rates as given by the
Reference Court in its judgment and order dated 29.10.1990, however,
with the modification that interest granted by the Reference Court at 9%
p.a. on excess amount shall be for one year from the date of possession.
It is made clear that the appellants would not be entitled to receive
interest on the enhanced compensation, according to this order for the
period from 29.10.1990 till date. The appeal is allowed accordingly.
8. The impugned judgment and order stand modified in the
above terms.
9. If there is any deficit on account of payment of Court fees,
same be made over and paid within two weeks from the date of order.
No costs.
JUDGE okMksns
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!