Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt.Daulatabai Shahabuddin ... vs Smt.Kulshambai Wd/O Allibhai ...
2017 Latest Caselaw 6285 Bom

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 6285 Bom
Judgement Date : 16 August, 2017

Bombay High Court
Smt.Daulatabai Shahabuddin ... vs Smt.Kulshambai Wd/O Allibhai ... on 16 August, 2017
Bench: A.S. Chandurkar
902-CAS-724,725-17                                                                                                     1/2


                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

                        CIVIL APPLICATION (CAS) NOS.724 & 725 OF 2017
                                                            IN
                                    SECOND APPEAL  NO.131 OF 2004
                                                               
                                 Daulatabai Shahabuddin Sattani and anr.
                                                           -vs-
                                        Kulshambai wd/o Allibhai Ajani
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders                                                Court's or Judge's Orders.
or directions and Registrar's orders.
  
                                                  Shri A. Khare, Advocate for applicants. 
                                                  Shri R. L. Khapre, Advocate for non-applicant No.1.

                                                         CORAM  :  A.S.CHANDURKAR, J.  

DATE : AUGUST 16, 2017

By these applications it is prayed that the delay in bringing on record the legal heirs of appellant No.1 be condoned.

In the application it is stated that after the appeal was admitted, the appellant No.1 expired on 30/03/2010. The appellant No.2 who is the son of appellant No.1 is already on record and therefore it is prayed that the other legal heirs be permitted to be brought on record.

The application is opposed by learned counsel for the non-applicant No.1. It is submitted that the reasons assigned are not satisfactory and the delay as caused is for a long period.

Considering the fact that the appellant No.2 who is the son of appellant No.1 was already on record, it is clear that the estate of the deceased was represented.

902-CAS-724,725-17 2/2

Hence accepting the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay stands condoned. The legal heirs are permitted to be brought on record. Amendment be carried out within a period of one week.

Civil applications are disposed of.

JUDGE

Asmita

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter