Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 6269 Bom
Judgement Date : 16 August, 2017
6-APPA-725-2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.725 OF 2017
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.69 OF 2010
SATISH MAHADEO BHARATE )...APPLICANT
V/s.
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA )...RESPONDENT
Mr.Shreeram Shirsat, Advocate for the Applicant.
Ms.N.S.Jain, APP for the Respondent - State.
CORAM : A. M. BADAR, J.
DATE : 16th AUGUST 2017 P.C. : 1 This is an application for early hearing moved by the
respondent / original accused in an appeal whereby the State is
challenging his acquittal for offences 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2)
of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
2 Heard the learned advocate appearing for the
applicant / respondent no.2 / original accused. He submits that
avk 1/2
6-APPA-725-2017.doc
the respondent / original accused is retiring within a short span of
time, and therefore, his appeal, which is of the year 2010, needs
to be decided expeditiously.
3 The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Hussain vs.
Union of India reported in 2017 (5) SCC 702 has directed this
court to dispose of criminal appeal wherein accused persons are in
jail for a period of five years or more. Several such appeals are
pending for hearing before this court. In the category of appeal
under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, appeals of the year
2001 and thereafter are still pending for disposal. The reason that
respondent is retiring shortly cannot be a sufficient reason to
grant out of turn hearing to this appeal.
4 The application is, therefore, rejected.
(A. M. BADAR, J.)
avk 2/2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!