Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 5911 Bom
Judgement Date : 14 August, 2017
1 W.P.No.8054/05
UNREPORTED
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE
AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
WRIT PETITION NO.8054 OF 2005
Shams Tabriz Mohammad Shaban,
Age 40 years, Occ.Service,
presently working as Assistant
Teacher, National Urdu High
School, Dhule,R/o Dhule,
Dist.Dhule. ... Petitioner.
Versus
1. The State of Maharashtra,
through its Secretary,
School Education Department,
Mantralaya, Mumbai.
2. The Director (Postal D.Ed.
Scheme), Maharashtra Educational
Research and Training
Institute, Pune.
3. The Education Officer
(Secondary), Zilla Parishad,
Dhule.
4. Anjuman Faroge Talem,
MaulawiGanj, Dhule, through
its President.
5. The Principal,
National Urdu High School,
Azad Nagar, Dhule,
Dist.Dhule. ... Respondents.
...
::: Uploaded on - 18/08/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 19/08/2017 00:28:36 :::
2 W.P.No.8054/05
Mr.S.R.Barlinge, advocate for the petitioner.
Mrs.A.V.Gondhalekar, Additional Government
Pleader for the State.
Mr.S.P.Brahme, advocate for Respondent Nos.4 and
5.
...
CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA AND
MANGESH S. PATIL,JJ.
Date : 14.08.2017.
ORAL JUDGMENT (Per S.V.Gangapurwala,J.)
1. The petitioner assails the order dated
6.9.2005, passed by the Respondent No.2
cancelling the admission to the postal D.Ed.
2. Mr.Barlinge, learned counsel for the
petitioner submits that though the petitioner was
appointed as a Peon, the petitioner was allowed
to take classes on honorary basis. Resolution to
that effect was also passed by the Management.
The learned counsel submits that thereafter
permission was granted to the petitioner for
taking postal D.Ed. course. The petitioner
passed his postal D.Ed. and got the D.Ed.
certificate. After 16 years of passing the D.Ed.
course, the Respondents cancelled the postal
D.Ed. admission. The petitioner since 5.1.1996
is functioning as an Assistant Teacher. Once
having given the admission in the postal D.Ed.
course, after 16 years it is not permissible to
cancel the same. The learned counsel relies on
the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of
"Shri Krishan Vs. The Kurukshetra University,
Kurukshetra" reported in AIR 1976 Supreme Court
376. Learned counsel also relies on the judgment
and order passed by this Court in group of
petitions dated 7.12.2010 in W.P.No.572/2006
(Shaikh Majid Ali S/o Liyakat Ali and others Vs.
The State of Maharashtra and others) (Coram
:B.R.Gavai and R.M.Borde,JJ).
3. Mr.Brahme, learned counsel for the
Respondents in fact supports the argument of the
learned counsel for the petitioner and submits
that Respondents had allowed the petitioner to
discharge the duties of a Teacher, however, the
said duty was additional one. On 6.10.1985,
Resolution was passed by the Management to permit
the petitioner to acquire qualification of D.Ed.
by post.
4. Learned Additional Government Pleader
submits that fraud is committed by the petitioner
and the Management and such an admission can not
be protected. The petitioner was not entitled to
be admitted to the postal D.Ed. course. After
making necessary inquiry and getting the inquiry
report from the Education Officer (Primary), so
also Divisional Deputy Director of Education, the
show cause notice was issued to the petitioner
and admission was cancelled.
5. It appears that initially the
petitioner was appointed as Peon on 1.4.1981. On
or about 1985-86 as per the case of the
petitioner and the Management, the petitioner
was additionally allowed to take classes, he
being HSC qualified. The Management claims to
have passed a Resolution to that effect. The
petitioner was permitted by the authority to
appear for postal D.Ed. and in 1987-88 got the
qualification of postal D.Ed.
6. In the meantime, the petitioner was
promoted as Junior Clerk on or about 1.8.1994 and
thereafter is appointed as Assistant Teacher on
5.1.1996.
7. This Court had directed the parties to
maintain statusquo. The impugned order was not
implemented. The petitioner today also is
performing his duties as Assistant Teacher but
because of the pendency of the Writ Petition, is
not granted approval as Assistant Teacher.
8. The Management appears to have passed a
Resolution allowing the petitioner to complete
postal D.Ed. The petitioner has successfully
completed postal D.Ed. course. After having
completed postal D.Ed. course and after a long
slumber of 16 years had passed by, the
Respondents ventured to cancel the admission of
the petitioner of postal D.Ed. This Court in
W.P.No.572 of 2006 (Shaikh Majid Ali S/o Liyakat
Ali and others Vs. The State of Maharashtra and
others) (Coram : B.R.Gavai and R.M.Borde,JJ.)
under judgment and order dated 7.12.2010 has
considered the said aspect in similar set of
facts and had allowed the the Writ Petitions of
the petitioners therein.
9. Considering above and the petitioner is
similarly situated, the impugned order is quashed
and set aside.
10. The petitioner pursuant to the present
order may approach the authorities for redressal
of his grievance and consequential benefits, if
any.
11. Rule accordingly made absolute in above
terms. No costs.
Sd/- Sd/-
(MANGESH S. PATIL,J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.)
asp/office/wp8054.05
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!