Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 1959 Bom
Judgement Date : 24 April, 2017
1 apl196.198.17.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.196/2017
1. Shriram s/o Ranjeet Joshi,
aged about 35 years, Occ. Private,
r/o Plot No. 83, Bharat Nagar,
Amravati Road, Nagpur.
2. Chetan s/o Rajendra Bhende,
aged 21 years, Occ. Private,
r/o Plto No. 6, Bharat Nagar,
Amravati Road, Nagpur .....APPLICANTS
...V E R S U S...
State of Maharashtra, through
PSO Ambazari, Nagpur. ...NON APPLICANTS
AND
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.198/2017
1. Chetan s/o Rajendra Bhende,
aged 21 years, Occ. Private,
r/o Plot No. 6, Bharat Nagar,
Amravati Road, Nagpur.
2. Shriram s/o Ranjeet Joshi,
aged about 35 years, Occ. Private,
r/o Plot No. 83, Bharat Nagar,
Amravati Road, Nagpur.
3. Chetan s/o Rajendra Bhende,
aged 21 years, Occ. Private,
r/o Plto No. 6, Bharat Nagar,
Amravati Road, Nagpur ...APPLICANTS
...V E R S U S...
State of Maharashtra, through
PSO Ambazari, Nagpur. ...NON APPLICANT
::: Uploaded on - 25/04/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 26/04/2017 00:43:45 :::
2 apl196.198.17.odt
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. R. R. Prajapati, Advocate for applicants.
Mr. M. J. Khan, A.P.P. for non applicant.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM:- B. P. DHARMADHIKARI AND
V. M. DESHPANDE, JJ.
DATED :- APRIL 24, 2017
ORAL JUDGMENT (Per : V. M. Deshpande, J.)
1. The applicant no.1 in Criminal Application
No.196/2017 is the complainant in FIR No.325/2015 and
applicant no.2 in the said criminal application is joined as accused.
Whereas in Criminal Application No. 198/2017, the applicant no.1
is the complainant in FIR No. 326/2015 and applicant nos. 2 and
3 in the said application are joined as accused in FIR
No.326/2016.
2. All the applicants are present today in the court. Their
learned counsel has identified them. According to the application
under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the
complainant in both the FIRs have stated on oath that due to the
misunderstanding the FIR is lodged against the accused persons
who are shown as accused in the respective FIRs. He submitted
that this Court should quash the FIR.
3 apl196.198.17.odt
3. Mr. M.J. Khan, the learned A.P.P. for the non applicant-
State submits that he wants time to filer reply.
4. We have gone through the contents of the applications
and also heard the learned counsel for the applicants. From a
reading of the FIR, it is clear that no public element is involved
and it is a dispute between the applicants amongst themselves.
Since, the complainants, who are applicants before this court, state
that they have already reached to the amicable settlement, there is
no possibility of the matter being taken to its logical end.
5. In that view of the matter and in view of the law laid
down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter of Narinder Singh
& Ors vs State Of Punjab & Anr reported in (2014) 6 SCC 466,
the applications are allowed. FIR Nos. 325/2015 and 326/2015,
registered with Police Station, Ambazari, Nagpur and charge-sheet
Nos. 96/2016 and 98/2016 are quashed.
The applications stand disposed of accordingly.
(V. M. Deshpande, J.) (B. P. Dharmadhikari, J.)
kahale
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!