Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 1867 Bom
Judgement Date : 20 April, 2017
1
wp4274.09.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Writ Petition No.4274 of 2009
Mata Bodrai Devi Shikshan
Sanstha Dhabe (Pauni),
Taluka Arjuni Morgaon,
District Gondia, throughout
its President Shri Shyamlal
Maniram Thawre,
Aged about 50 years,
Resident of Dhabe (Pauni),
Taluka Arjuni Morgaon,
District Gondia. ... Petitioner
Versus
1. The Education Officer (Secondary),
Zilla Parishad, Gondia.
2. Mahadeo Pandurang Kopulwar,
Aged about 63 years,
Occupation - Nil, and
Resident of Dhabe (Pauni),
Taluka Arjuni Morgaon,
District Gondia. ... Respondents
Shri K.L. Dharmadhikari, Assistant Government Pleader for
Respondent No.1.
Shri A.D. Mohgaonkar, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
Coram : R.K. Deshpande, J.
th Dated : 20 April, 2017
wp4274.09.odt
Oral Judgment :
1. This petition challenges the judgment and order
dated 14-8-2009 passed in Appeal No.18 of 2007 by the School
Tribunal, Nagpur, in exercise of its jurisdiction under
Section 9(1)(a) of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools
(Conditions of Service) Regulations Act, 1977. The termination
of the respondent No.2-Mahadeo Pandurang Kopulwar by an
order dated 3-3-2009 has been set aside and the Management is
directed to pay full back wages and all pensionery benefits as per
the rules from the date of superannuation. The respondent No.2
attained the age of superannuation on 31-7-2008, i.e. during the
pendency of the appeal before the Tribunal.
2. The respondent No.2 was appointed as Assistant Teacher
in the year 1972. He was confirmed in employment on the said
post, and thereafter he was promoted to the post of Head Master
on 21-6-1990. After holding an enquiry, he was terminated from
service on 3-3-2007, which was the subject-matter of challenge
before the School Tribunal.
wp4274.09.odt
3. On 20-9-2010, this Court passed a detailed order, which
is reproduced below :
" Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2] Civil Application No.423/2010 and Civil Application No.806/2010 are for joining the applicants as respondents in the present petition.
3] The applications are allowed. Necessary amendment be carried out within a period of two weeks.
4] The matter is heard by consent of the parties for admission. The petition challenges the judgment and order dated 14th August, 2009, passed by the School Tribunal, allowing the appeal filed by the respondent no.2/employee, by setting aside the order of termination dated 3rd March, 2007. The respondent no.2/employee is superannuated during the pendency of the appeal on 31.7.2008. The tribunal directed the payment of full back-wages from the date of termination till the date of his retirement. The further direction is also given that all pensionery benefits to the employee be released in accordance with Rules.
5] Shri Mohgaonkar, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.2 submits that the added respondents are in fact managing the school. The order of termination dated 3.3.2007, which was the subject matter of challenge in Appeal No.18/2007, was also issued by the one of the added respondent.
wp4274.09.odt
6] The learned counsel appearing for the added respondents submits that the added respondents are in the management and have partially complied with the orders passed by the School Tribunal and they are taking steps to comply with the remaining part of the order.
7] The respondent no.2/employee is satisfied with the steps taken to comply the order passed by the School Tribunal, by the added respondents. Shri Mohagaonkar, points out that by an order dated 6.8.2010 issued by the Education Department of Zilla Parishad, the pension of the respondent no.2/employee has been finalized, although a provisional pension was given to the respondent no.2 on earlier occasion.
8] So far as back-wages are concerned, the added respondents are taking steps to submit the salary bills to the Education Officer for sanction. The dispute raised is about the management of the school. The added respondents are claiming that they are in the management of the school, whereas the petitioner is claiming to be in the management of the School through its President Shri Shyamlal Maniram Thawre. Shri Borkar submits that if contention of petitioner is accepted then respondent/employee would be out of job. Hence, Rule.
Learned counsel for the respondents waives service of notice.
9] So far as interim order is concerned, the respondent no.2 is satisfied with the steps taken for compliance by the added respondents. In view of this, there is no question of grant of interim relief, particularly in the background of controversy pointed out in earlier para. The interim relief is, therefore, rejected.
10] It is further made clear that the pendency of this
wp4274.09.odt
petition shall not come in the way of the authorities concerned to release either the amount of back-wages or the amount of final pension and the same shall be subject to the result of the petition."
It is informed that the pension of the respondent No.2 has been
released, but without payment of back wages and fixation of
salary.
4. Shri Mohgaonkar, the learned counsel appearing for the
respondent No.2, has invited my attention to the decision of the
Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No.3682 of 2015,
delivered on 27-11-2015. The petition was decided by consent of
parties and hence the order being short, is reproduced below :
" Heard.
The writ petition is disposed of with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, in the following terms :
1] An inspector or offer from the office of the Assistant Charity Commissioner, Gondia should be appointed as an Election Officer so that the elections to the management of the trust could be conducted within a time frame.
wp4274.09.odt
2] That, the Assistant Charity Commissioner should appoint an inspector and/or officer from the office of the Assistant Charity Commissioner, Gondia as an Election Officer within a period of three weeks.
3] The Election Officer so appointed should conduct the elections to the management of the trust within a period of three months, by initiation of a fresh election programme, from the date of appointment of the Election Officer.
4] The body on Schedule-I should continue with the management of the trust till the elections are conducted.
5] No costs.
Steno copy of this order is granted to the learned Assistant Government Pleader on request."
5. In view of the aforesaid order, Shri Mohgaonkar submits
that the Management Committee was constituted as per the
report of the Assistant Charity Commissioner submitted on
29-3-2016 and the said Committee decided not to prosecute this
petition further and to grant all the benefits to the respondent
No.2 flowing from the judgment and order impugned in this
petition.
wp4274.09.odt
6. The Committee of Management, which is on the record
of the Charity Commissioner, having taken a decision to comply
with the order passed by the School Tribunal, I do not find any
reason to permit the petitioner, who is not in the Management
now, to continue to prosecute this petition. The petition is,
therefore, dismissed on this ground. Rule stands discharged. No
order as to costs.
7. The respondent No.1-Education Officer is directed to
release the amount of back wages, if the bills are already
submitted; to fix the salary of the respondent No.2; and
thereafter to revise the pension, if any, in accordance with the
last pay drawn. This exercise be carried out within a period of
two months from the date of completion all the formalities by the
Management.
JUDGE.
Lanjewar
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!