Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 1548 Bom
Judgement Date : 7 April, 2017
1 wp3484.16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.3484/2016
Shri Kishor S/o Ghanshyam Gaur,
age 50 Yrs., Occu. Private,
R/o Nari Road, Manav Nagar,
Near Prem Furniture, Plot No.17,
Nagpur. ..Petitioner.
..Vs..
Smt. Alaukika W/o Shriram Deogade,
age 70 Yrs., Occu. Housewife,
R/o Nari Road, Manav Nagar,
Near Prem Furniture, Plot No.17,
Nagpur. ..Respondent.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Shri Raju Dhoble, Advocate for the petitioner.
Shri Dilip Dani, Advocate for the respondent.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
CORAM : Z.A.HAQ, J.
DATE : 7.4.2017. ORAL JUDGMENT
1. Heard Shri Raju Dhoble, Advocate for the petitioner and Shri Dilip Dani,
Advocate for the respondent.
2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.
3. The original defendant has challenged the order passed by the trial Court
directing him to pay arrears of rent from January, 2014 to November, 2014 and
continue to pay the rent every month till disposal of the suit. This order is passed on
2 wp3484.16
an application filed by the plaintiff under Order 15-A of the Code of Civil Procedure.
The contention of the defendant is that he is not liable to pay the arrears of rent for
the period from January, 2014 to November, 2014 as the rent for that period is paid
by money orders and the documentary evidence is produced on record of the trial
Court to substantiate this.
4. The claim of the petitioner is that the defendant has not paid rent from
January, 2014 to November, 2014. According to the defendant he has paid the rent
for the above period, however, the plaintiff had not issued receipts acknowledging the
payment of rent and, therefore, subsequently he started sending rent by money-orders
and to substantiate this the defendant has relied on postal receipts dated 23.12.2014,
21.1.2015, 21.2.2015, 25.3.2015, 24.4.2015, 21.5.2015, 24.6.2015, 24.7.2015,
24.8.2015, 26.9.2015 and 28.10.2015.
After considering the facts on the record, I find that, at this stage, the
contention of the defendant that he paid the rent for the period from January, 2014
to November, 2014 cannot be accepted. The trial Court has not committed any error
by observing that the defendant is in arrears of rent for the period from January,
2014 till November, 2014. However, in the facts of the case it would be appropriate
to direct the defendant to deposit the amount of arrears of rent from January, 2014 to
November, 2014 at the rate of Rs.1,500/- per month with the trial Court and
disbursement of this amount shall be as per the orders to be passed at the time of
disposal of the civil suit. With this modification, the impugned order passed by the
trial Court is maintained. The writ petition is disposed in the above terms. In the
circumstances, the parties to bear their own costs.
3 wp3484.16
The amount of the arrears for the period from January, 2014 to
November, 2014 shall be deposited by the defendant till 2 nd May, 2017.
JUDGE
Tambaskar.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!