Wednesday, 29, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sewa Sahakari Sanstha Thru. ... vs State Of Mah. Thru. Secty. And 2 Ors
2017 Latest Caselaw 1435 Bom

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 1435 Bom
Judgement Date : 4 April, 2017

Bombay High Court
Sewa Sahakari Sanstha Thru. ... vs State Of Mah. Thru. Secty. And 2 Ors on 4 April, 2017
Bench: Ravi K. Deshpande
                                 1
                                                         wp1537.07.odt

   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
             NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

                  Writ Petition No.1537 of 2007

   Sewa Sahakari Sanstha,
   through its President,
   Shri Dyneshwar Deoraoji Varhade,
   Aged 46 years,
   Occupation - Agril,
   Mouza Nakshi, Tah. Bhiwapur,
   District Nagpur.                                 ... Petitioner

        Versus

   1. State of Maharashtra,
      through its Secretary,
      Food & Civil Supplies Dept.,
      Mantralaya, Mumbai-32.

   2. Deputy Commissioner (Supply),
      Nagpur.

   3. District Supply Officer,
      Nagpur.

   4. Sanjay s/o Sampatrao Bhoyar,
      Aged about 45 years,
      R/o Nukshi, Taluka Bhiwapur,
      District Nagpur - [Intervenor]                ... Respondents


   None for Petitioner and Intervenor-Respondent No.4.
   Shri   K.L.   Dharmadhikari,   Assistant   Government   Pleader   for 
   Respondent Nos.1 to 3.


             Coram : R.K. Deshpande, J.

th Date : 4 April, 2017

wp1537.07.odt

Oral Judgment :

1. None appears for the petitioner and the

intervenor-respondent No.4. On the last two occasions also,

none appeared for the petitioner. Heard Shri K.L.

Dharmadhikari, the learned Assistant Government Pleader

appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 3.

2. The petitioner-Society, which was authorized to run a

fair price shop, was issued a show cause notice dated 7-10-

2004, by the District Supply Officer, Nagpur, bringing to its

notice the following irregularities :

"1) The BPL wheat 9 quintal, Antodaya wheat 3.92 quintal, SGRY wheat 24.35 quintal Total 35.25 quintal wheat and BPL rice 3.70 quintal, Antodaya 2 quintal rice SGRY 3.30 and SGRY 3.30 quintal and midday meal (School) rice 0.55 quintal total 9.55 quintal rice was found short as per record. Hence the above stock has been misappropriated.

2) The BPL and Antodaya beneficiaries have received the food grains or not, could not be verified from the sale register and bill book. But false entries were found in the

wp1537.07.odt

ration cards. This has been on the basis of statements of records.

3) The Antodaya beneficiaries were not distributed the food grains as per Govt. fixed quantum of 25 Kg wheat and 10 Kg rice and actually 10 kg wheat and 5 kg rice has been distributed to each card holder and hence false entries noticed.

4) The list of BPL and Antodaya beneficiaries was not displayed in the shop.

5) It was also noticed that the distribution is not in accordance with the government fixed quantum.

            6)        Samples were not displayed.


            7)        The   entries   of   sale   after   July   2004   were   not  

maintained in the sale and stock list."

3. The petitioner-Society submitted its reply on

24-1-2005. After conducting an enquiry, the District Supply

Officer, Nagpur, passed an order dated 11-8-2005, whereby it

is held that the charges levelled against the petitioner-Society

are proved and there is a violation of the provisions of

wp1537.07.odt

Clauses 18(2) (c) (d) (g) (h) (i) and (l) of the Maharashtra

Scheduled Commodities (Regulation of Distribution)

Regulation, 1975. He, therefore, cancelled the licence of the

fair price shop of the petitioner-Society, ordering that the

deficit stock of 37.29 quintal wheat and 9.55 quintal rice in

the shop of the petitioner-Society be recovered at the rate of

APL and deposited in the government treasury. In appeal, the

aforesaid order was maintained by the Deputy Commissioner

(Supply), Nagpur Division, Nagpur, by his order

dated 17-12-2005.

4. However, in revision, the Minister, Food, Civil Supply

and Consumer Protection, has passed an order allowing the

revision partly on 7-7-2006. The operative portion of the

order is reproduced below :

"1. Revision Appeal partially allowed.

2. The order of D.S.O., dated 11-8-2005 and Deputy Commissioner's Order dated 17-12-2005 is quashed and set-aside.

wp1537.07.odt

3. Rs.10,000/- is imposed as fine for irregularities noticed and entire security deposit forfeited and the fair price shop authorization may be restored.

4. Rs.92,017/- to be recovered against the 46.80 Quintal foodgrains misappropriated by applicant at the rate of Rs.20/- per kg. as per market rate.

5. Same irregularities shall not be repeated in future by the applicant, such written undertaking be obtained from the applicant. If such irregularity was noticed in future the authorisation of F.P.S. will be permanently cancelled.

6. All concerned to be informed by this order."

The finding of misappropriation of food-grains is confirmed by

the Minister, and the order warns the petitioner-Society not to

repeat such acts in future. The penalty of Rs.10,000/- and

forfeiture of security deposit is imposed upon the

petitioner-Society. The recovery of Rs.92,017/- is also

directed to be made for misappropriation of food-grains at the

rate of Rs.20/- per kg. as per the market rate.

wp1537.07.odt

5. The matter was admitted on 18-4-2007, and by virtue

of interim relief, the order passed by the Minister was stayed,

granting permission to the petitioner-Society to run a fair

price shop.

6. It is not understood as to how the Minister, after

recording the finding of misappropriation of food-grains,

restores the authorization of fair price shop to the petitioner.

Misappropriation of food-grains is a serious charge, and all

the authorities are concurrent in recording such finding.

Therefore, no leniency was required to be shown. Be that as

it may, it is only the order imposition of fine and recovery of

misappropriated food-grains, which is the subject-matter of

challenge in this petition. There is no ground to interfere in

the order passed by the Minister, and the petition deserves to

be dismissed. The petition is dismissed. Rule stands

discharged. No order as to costs.

7. If the petitioner-Society fails to deposit the amount as

per the order passed by the Minister within a period of two

months from today, the same shall be recoverable as arrears

wp1537.07.odt

of land revenue with interest at the rate of 15% per annum

from the date of the order, i.e. 7-7-2006, till recovery.

Judge.

Lanjewar,PS

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter