Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 5454 Bom
Judgement Date : 21 September, 2016
WP No.401/2016 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.401 OF 2016
Petitioners : 1] Dr. Jagannath Digambar Chate,
Aged 30 years,
Occupation : Incharge Medical Superintendent,
Rural Hospital, Sindakhed Raja,
District Buldhana.
2] State of Maharasthtra,
Through Police Station Officer, Mehkar,
District Buldhana.
-- Versus --
Respondents : 1] Dr. Sunil Totaram Kayande,
Aged about 35 years, Occupation : Radiologist,
R/o Deulgaon Raja,
District Buldhana.
2] Dr. Dnyaneshwar Pandharinath Lahane,
Aged 32 years, Occupation : Radiologist,
R/o Deulgaon Raja,
District Buldhana.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Shri S.A. Ashirgade, A.P.P. for the Petitioners.
Shri M.I. Dhatrak, Advocate for the Respondents.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
C ORAM : S. B. SHUKRE, J.
DATE : 21
SEPTEMBER, 2016.
st
ORAL JUDGMENT :-
Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.
02] Heard finally by consent of the learned Counsel for the parties.
03] By this writ petition, the legality and correctness of the order
dated 23/10/2015 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Mehkar
has been questioned.
04] The submission is that though Dr. Lahane was the visiting doctor
rendering his services at Sanap Hospital as well as Shinde Hospital and Dr.
Kayande was the visiting doctor rendering his services at Shinde Hospital,
they were under the duty to maintain the register of the patients whose
radiological examinations were undertaken in these hospitals.
05] I must say that making of an allegation is one thing and
substantiating the allegation is another. In the absence of any document
being produced on record, showing that it was agreed by these doctors that
they would themselves maintain the registers and records or maintenance of
registers and records was one of the terms of their engagement as visiting
doctors of these hospitals, no criminal liability could be fastened upon these
doctors. They were admittedly the visiting doctors and there being no
material available on record showing that it was the part of their duty or
engagement as visiting doctors to maintain the records, the impugned order
cannot be found to be illegal or arbitrary. There is no merit in the writ
petition and it deserves to be dismissed.
The writ petition stands dismissed. Rule is discharged.
JUDGE *sdw
C E R T I F I C A T E
I certify that this judgment uploaded is a true and
correct copy of the original signed judgment.
Uploaded by: S.D. Waghmare Uploaded on : 22/09/2016
P.A. to the Hon'ble Judge.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!