Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 5209 Bom
Judgement Date : 7 September, 2016
1 sa426.02.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
SECOND APPEAL NO. 426 OF 2002
Namdeo Petanna Chilve
(deceased through L.Rs)
1] Ramesh Namdeo Chilve,
aged 65 years, Occ. Business,
R/o. Bagad Khidki, Distt. Chandrapur
2]
Diwakar Namdeo Chilve,
aged 55 years, Occ. Driver, Res -Gauri
Talav, Chandrapur.
3] Ram Namdeo Chilve,
aged 59 years, Occ. Labour,
R/o. Sindewahi, Chandrapur ...... APPELLANTS
...VERSUS...
Shahi Gupta Masjid Trust No.B,C-3
through Shafi Mohd. Abdul Gafoor,
aged 58 years, Occ. Service,
President of Plaintiff Trust,
R/o.Anchaleshwar Ward,
Chandrapur....... RESPONDENT
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shri S.Y.Deopujari, counsel for Appellants.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM: R. K. DESHPANDE, J.
th DATE : 7 SEPTEMBER, 2016
ORAL JUDGMENT
1] Shri Deopujari, the learned counsel appearing
for the appellant invited my attention to the decision of this
2 sa426.02.odt
Court in the case of Namdeo Pandurang Khedkar vrs.
Shahi Gupta Masjid Chandrapur, delivered on 18th
November, 2013 in Second Appeal No. 180 of 1995 and also
the another decision delivered by this Court on 15 th March,
2016, in Second Appeal Nos. 424 and 425 of 2002, and
submits that the controversy involved in the present case is
covered by the said decisions and the second appeal needs
to be allowed.
2] On 24th October, 2005, this Court had framed the
following substantial question of law,
Whether the suit as prayed without joining of
the trustees as parties was maintainable?
3] In fact, the present second appeal was to be
heard along with the aforesaid second appeals which have
already been decided. Since the present appeal was
dismissed in default, it cannot be decided at that time. The
substantial question of law framed in the present matter has
been answered in the aforesaid two decisions, holding that
the suit as prayed without joining the trustees as parties was
3 sa426.02.odt
not maintainable. Hence, the present second appeal needs
to be allowed and the suit is liable to be dismissed as not
maintainable.
4] In the result, the second appeal is allowed. The
judgment and order dated 30.08.2002 passed by the lower
appellate Court in Regular Civil Appeal No. 32 of 1994 is
hereby quashed and set aside and the decision of the trial
Court delivered on 03.01.1994 in Regular Civil Suit No.285 of
1990 is restored. No order as to costs.
JUDGE
Rvjalit
4 sa426.02.odt
C E R T I F I C A T E
"I certify that this Judgment/Order uploaded is a true and correct copy
of original signed Judgment/Order.
Uploaded by : R.V.Jalit, P.A. Uploaded on : 7th SEPTEMBER, 2016
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!