Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

1. Bhujanga Abba Patil And Others vs 1. Dnyanu Ramchandra Powar S/D 1A. ...
2016 Latest Caselaw 6419 Bom

Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 6419 Bom
Judgement Date : 27 October, 2016

Bombay High Court
1. Bhujanga Abba Patil And Others vs 1. Dnyanu Ramchandra Powar S/D 1A. ... on 27 October, 2016
Bench: R.D. Dhanuka
                                                                     p1-sa209-94

vai




                                                                                   
                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                         CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION




                                                           
                            SECOND APPEAL NO.209 OF 1994


      Bhujanga Abba Patil, since deceased,




                                                          
      through his L.Rs. - Smt.Bayanabai B. Patil & Ors.          ...Appellants
                 V/s.
      Dnyanu R. Powar, since deceased,
      through his L.Rs. - Muktabai D. Powar & Ors.               ...Respondents




                                                   
      Mr.Kiran Pawar i/b Mr.B.R. Patil for the Appellants.
                                       
      Mr.N.J. Patil for the Respondents.

                                         CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA, J.

DATE : 27TH OCTOBER, 2016.

P.C. :-

1. The matter is placed on board for speaking to the minutes

of the order and judgment dated 26 th October, 2016. By consent of

parties, following inadvertent errors crept in the said order and

judgment are corrected as under :-

a). At page 3, para 1 the word "petition" to be read as

"appeal".

b). At page 4, para 2, second line, the Survey No."24/1" to be

read as "24/2".

c). At page 4, para 2, second line, the figure "9" be read as

"19".

p1-sa209-94

d). At page 6, para 10, the words "The first appellate" be read

as "This".

e). At page 7, para 12, 8 th line, the word "defendants" be read

as "plaintiffs".

f). At page 7, para 12, 9th line, the word "Mahadev" be read

as "Yeshwant".

g). At page 7, para 12, 15th line, the words "brother of the" are

deleted.

h).

At page 8, last sentence of para 15, the figures "6" and

"20" to be read as "4" and "30" respectively.

i). At page 9, para 15, second line the word "defendants" to

be read as "plaintiffs". In the same para, last three lines, the word

"western" to be read as "eastern".

j). At page 14, para 27, the last sentence of para 27, the word

"defendants" be read as "plaintiffs".

k). At page 18, para 34, 14th line, the word "plaintiffs" be read

as "defendants".

l). At page 19, para 37, 5th line, the figure "24/1" be read as

"24/2".

2. The order and judgment dated 26th October, 2015 stands

corrected accordingly.

(R.D. DHANUKA, J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter