Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 6383 Bom
Judgement Date : 26 October, 2016
1 jg.wp3960.15.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
Writ Petition No. 3960 of 2015
Subhash S/o Bhagwan Surdkar
Age - 43, Occ-Service, R/o- Zilla Parishad
Primary School, Mandva Post, Adol,
Tq - Jalgaon (Jamod) & Dist. Buldhana. .... Petitioner
// Versus //
(1) Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny
Committee Division, Nandurbar through
its Chairman, Adiwasi Vikas Bhavan,
Nandurbar Tq-Dist- Nandurbar.
(2) Chief Executive Officer,
Zilla Parishad Buldhana,
Tq-Dist-Buldhana. .... Respondents
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shri M. V. Bute, Advocate for the petitioner
Shri A. V. Palshikar, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent no. 1
Shri S. M. Ukey, Advocate for respondent no. 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : Smt. Vasanti A. Naik and
Kum. Indira Jain, JJ.
DATE : 26-10-2016.
ORAL JUDGMENT (Per : Smt. Vasanti A. Naik, J.)
Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. The petition is heard
finally with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties.
2. By this petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the
respondent no. 1 - Scrutiny Committee to decide the caste claim of the
.....2/-
2 jg.wp3960.15.odt
petitioner and further seeks a direction against the respondent no. 2 to
protect the services of the petitioner till his caste claim is decided.
3. Shri Palshikar, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing
on behalf of the Scrutiny Committee states on instructions that the caste
claim of the petitioner is pending before the Scrutiny Committee and the
Scrutiny Committee would decide the same as early as possible.
4.
In view of the statement made on behalf of the Scrutiny
Committee, it would be necessary to allow the petition. Hence, the writ
petition is allowed. The respondent no. 1 Scheduled Tribe Certificate
Scrutiny Committee, Division Nandurbar is directed to decide the caste
claim of the petitioner within 15 months from the date of appearance of the
petitioner before it. The petitioner undertakes to remain present before the
Scrutiny Committee on 22-11-2016.
The respondent no. 2 is directed to protect the services of the
petitioner till his caste claim is decided.
Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms with no order as to
costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
wasnik
...../-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!