Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shri. Padam S/O. Roshanlal Ghai ... vs Dr. Balasaheb S/O. Wasudeorao ...
2016 Latest Caselaw 5837 Bom

Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 5837 Bom
Judgement Date : 4 October, 2016

Bombay High Court
Shri. Padam S/O. Roshanlal Ghai ... vs Dr. Balasaheb S/O. Wasudeorao ... on 4 October, 2016
Bench: Prasanna B. Varale
                                              1                                       WP4323.15.odt




                                                                                           
      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
               : NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.




                                                                   
                           WRIT PETITION NO. 4323 OF 2015

    PETITIONERS              : 1] Shri Padam S/o Roshanlal Ghai




                                                                  
                                  Aged 38 years, Occu. Business,

                                    2] Smt. Prem W/o Omprakash Ghai,
                                       Aged 75 years, Occu. Business.




                                                  
                                       Both R/o House No. 1487, Old Ward No.23,
                               ig      Wardhaman Nagar, Nagpur.

                                    3] M/s Punjab Boot House,
                                       A registered partnership firm,
                             
                                       Deoghare Mohalla, Teennal Chouk,
                                       through its partners petitioner nos.1 and 2.

                                              - VERSUS -
      


    RESPONDENT               : Dr. Balasaheb S/o Wasudeorao Motghare,
                               Aged about 75 years Occu. Retired. 
   



                               R/o Bansod Building, Ruikar Road,
                               Chitnavis Park Square, Nagpur - 18.

                      -------------------------------------------------------------
           Mr. M. I. Mourya, Advocate for the petitioners.





           Mr. A. A. Sambaray, Advocate for the respondent.
                      ------------------------------------------------------------

                     CORAM :    PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.
                     DATE     :  OCTOBER 04, 2016.





    ORAL JUDGMENT


Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally with

the consent of the learned counsel for the parties at the stage of

admission itself.

                                          2                                 WP4323.15.odt




                                                                                  
    2]              The   learned   counsel   for   the   respondent   invited   my

attention to the judgment and order passed by this Court in Writ

Petition No. 4322 of 2015, dated 03.08.2016 and submitted that said

writ petition was the connected petition and the parties to the present

petition were the parties to W. P. No.4322/2015. It is further submitted

that an identical issue involved in present writ petition i.e. decree for

eviction was passed and an interim order directing the petitioners to

deposit occupation charges, was the subject matter in W.P.

No.4322/2015. The learned counsel for the petitioners fairly admits the

submissions of the learned counsel for the respondent. Both the learned

counsel appearing for the parties submit that the present petition be

disposed of on the same lines of the judgment and order of this Court in

Writ petition No. 4322/2015, dated 03.08.2016.

3] In view of the submissions of the learned counsel for the

parties and on perusal of the judgment and order dated 03.08.2016 in

Writ Petition No.4322/2015, I am of the opinion that the present

petition can be disposed of on the same lines of the judgment and order

of this Court in Writ petition No. 4322/2015, dated 03.08.2016.

4] The petitioners, who are the original defendants against

whom the decree for eviction has been passed are aggrieved by the

3 WP4323.15.odt

order passed by the appellate Court directing them to deposit a sum of

Rs.5,000/- per month towards occupation charges in Court.

5] This Court while issuing notice on 28.07.2015, directed the

petitioners to deposit occupation charges @ Rs.2,000/- per month from

05.03.2015 onwards.

6]

After hearing the respective counsel for the parties, it is

found that the interests of justice would be served if the appeal that is

pending before the Appellate Court is directed to be decided

expeditiously. The interim order dated 28.07.2015 can be permitted to

operate till the time the appeal is decided.

    7]              Hence, the following order is passed :

                    i]     The   petitioners   shall   continue   to   deposit   occupation

charges @ Rs.2000/- per month in terms of order dated 28.07.2015.

This arrangement is, however, without prejudice to the rights of the

parties. The proceedings in Regular Civil Appeal No. 164 of 2015 are

expedited. As the paper book has already been prepared, the Appellate

Court shall decide the appeal as expeditiously as possible and preferably

by the end of November, 2016.

                                              4                                    WP4323.15.odt




                                                                                         
                      ii]     It   is   clarified   that   this   Court   has   not   examined   the

correctness of the findings recorded in the order dated 26.06.2015 and

the appeal shall be decided on its own merits and in accordance with

law.

iii] Rule is made absolute in aforesaid terms. No costs.




                                                 
                                                              JUDGE
    Diwale
                               
                              
      
   







                                         5                                WP4323.15.odt




                                                                                
                                      C E R T I F I C A T E




                                                        

"I certify that this Judgment/order uploaded is a true and

correct copy of original signed Judgment/Order."

Uploaded By : Parag P. Diwale, P.A. Uploaded on: 05.10.2016

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter