Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 6623 Bom
Judgement Date : 22 November, 2016
2211WP6509.16-Judgment 1/2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 6509 OF 2016
PETITIONER :- Vrushabh Nileshrao Bhande, aged about 21
yrs, occu. Student, R/o. Chandkheda, Tq.
Daryapur, Dist. Amravati.
...VERSUS...
RESPONDENTS :- 1) Divisional Caste Scrutiny Committee,
Amravati Division, Committee No.1,
Amravati.
ig 2) Sant Gadgebaba Amravati University,
Amravati, through its Registrar.
3) The Principal, Babasaheb Naik College of
Engineering, Pusad, Tq. Pusad, Dist.
Yavatmal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. N.A.Gawande, counsel for the petitioner.
Mrs.G. Tiwari, Asstt.Govt.Pleader for the respondent No.1.
Mrs.M.P.Munshi, counsel for the respondent No.3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK &
MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.
DATED : 22.11.2016
O R A L J U D G M E N T (Per Smt. Vasanti A Naik, J.)
Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. The writ petition
is heard finally at the stage of admission, as a notice for final disposal
was issued against the respondents and all the respondents are duly
served.
2211WP6509.16-Judgment 2/2
2) By this writ petition, the petitioner seeks a direction
against the Scrutiny Committee to decide the caste claim of the
petitioner within a time frame. The petitioner seeks a direction against
the College and the University to protect the education of the petitioner
in the engineering course.
3) Mrs.Tiwari, the learned Assistant Government Pleader
appearing for the Scrutiny Committee, states on instructions that the
caste claim of the petitioner is pending before the Scrutiny Committee
and the same could be decided within three months.
4) By accepting the statement made by the learned Assistant
Government Pleader, which would be binding on the Scrutiny
Committee, we allow this writ petition. The respondent-Scrutiny
Committee should decide the caste claim of the petitioner within three
months. The petitioner's education is protected till his caste claim is
decided. This would mean that the petitioner should be admitted to the
classes, permitted to attend the classes, appear at the examinations and
the results of the petitioner should be declared, if there is no other
impediment in doing so. Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms
with no order as to costs.
Steno copy of this judgment is granted at the request of
the petitioner.
JUDGE JUDGE
KHUNTE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!