Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 2404 Bom
Judgement Date : 6 May, 2016
apl.837.15+
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT NAGPUR, NAGPUR.
...
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 837 /2015 & CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 50 /2016
Cri. APL.NO. 837/2015:
Jaykumar s/o Muthyalu Patta Aged about 52 years,
Occu. Govt. Service
Ordinance Factory, Chanda Tahsil Bhadrawati Dist. Chandrapur.
ig ..APPLICANT
v e r s u s
1) State of Maharashtra
Through Police Station officer
Police Station Bhadrawati Dist. Chandrpaur.
2) Mrs. Vijaya w/o Abraham Samuel Aged about 44 years, R/o Pandhare Society Gautam nagar, Bhadrawati
Dist.Chandrapur. .. ...NON-APPLICANTS (RESPONDENTS) ...........................................................................................................................
Mr. R. M.Daga, Advocate for the applicant Ms.M.H. Deshmukh, A.P.P. for Respondent no.1 -State
Mr. Pankaj Navlani, Advocate for Respondent no.2 ............................................................................................................................ Cri. APL.NO. 50/2016
Dilip s/o Bhaurao Wakde Aged 53 years, occu: service R/o Plot No. 98, Siddeshwar Nagar Kharbi Ring Road, Nagpur. ..APPLICANT
v e r s u s
apl.837.15+
1) State of Maharashtra Through Police Station officer Police Station, Bhadrawati
Dist. Chandrpaur.
2) Mrs. Vijaya w/o Abraham Samuel Aged about 44 years, R/o Pandhare Society
Gautam nagar, Bhadrawati Dist. Chandrapur. .. ...NON-APPLICANTS (RESPONDENTS)
...........................................................................................................................
Mr. I.S.Charlewar, Advocate for the applicant
Ms.M.H. Deshmukh, A.P.P. for Respondent no.1 -State Mr. Pankaj Navlani, Advocate for Respondent no.2
............................................................................................................................
CORAM: B.R. GAVAI &
Mrs. SWAPNA JOSHI,JJ .
DATED : 6th May, 2016
ORAL JUDGMENT: (PER B.R.GAVAI, J.)
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard the
learned counsel for the parties finally, by consent.
2. The applicant is seeking quashment of the FIR
registered vide Crime No.185/2015.
3. While issuing notice, this Court had directed that
charge-sheet should not be filed.
4. It appears that the matter has been settled between the
applicant and respondent no.2
apl.837.15+
5. Ms. Meghali Gawande, Police Sub Inspector, who is the
Investigating Officer is personally present in the Court. The learned
A.P.P. on the instructions of the Investigating Officer states that the
complainant has given a statement that she had lodged the F.I.R.
in a disturbed state of mind and she does not wish to prosecute the
complaint.
6.
Learned A.P.P. states that though the Investigating
Officer desires to file 'B' summary before the learned Judicial
Magistrate First Class, on account of the interim order passed by
this Court, 'B' summary is not filed.
7. We recall the our interim order dated 13.01.2016 and
permit the Investigating Officer to file 'B' summary.
8. Since 'B' summary is being filed, both the Applications
have served its purpose. Disposed of as such.
JUDGE JUDGE
sahare
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!