Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ram Ambrushi Shete vs State Of Mah & Ors
2016 Latest Caselaw 979 Bom

Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 979 Bom
Judgement Date : 29 March, 2016

Bombay High Court
Ram Ambrushi Shete vs State Of Mah & Ors on 29 March, 2016
Bench: A.V. Nirgude
                                                                           wp6074-05
                                             -1-




                                                                           
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                             BENCH AT AURANGABAD




                                                   
                            WRIT PETITION NO. 6074 OF 2005




                                                  
     1]       Ram S/o Ambrushi Shete,
              Age 43 years, Occ-Business,
              R/o At & Po : Deolali, Tq. Bhoom,
              Dist. Osmanabad.




                                       
                                                            ... PETITIONER

                      VERSUS 
     1]       The State of Maharashtra,
              (Through its Secretary, Food
                            
              Civil Supplies and Consumer Protection
              Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32.)

     2]       The Honourable Minister for
      

              Food Civil Supplies & Consumer Protection
              Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32.
   



     3]       The Collector, Osmanabad.

     4]       The Deputy Commissioner (Supply)





              Aurangabad.

     5]       The District Supply Officer,
              Osmanabad.

     6]       The Tahsildar,





              Bhoom.

     7]       Shri Sunil Navnath Thorat,
              Age 35 years, Occ- Business,
              R/o At & Po : Deolali,
              Tq. Bhoom, Dist. Osmanabad.
                                                            .. RESPONDENTS
                                             ...

     Mr. A. B. Chalak, Advocate h/f Mr. S. B. Talekar, Adv. for Petitioner.
     Mr. A. G. Magre, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 6


    ::: Uploaded on - 04/04/2016                   ::: Downloaded on - 31/07/2016 10:56:57 :::
                                                                                 wp6074-05
                                             -2-

     Mr. S. S. Jadhavar, Advocate for Respondent No.7.




                                                                                
                                   ...




                                                        
                                        CORAM :    A.V.NIRGUDE &
                                                   V.L.ACHLIYA,JJ.

DATED : 29TH MARCH,2016

ORAL JUDGMENT : (PER V.L.ACHLIYA,J.) :-

The Writ Petition challenges order dated 20 th July, 2005 passed by Hon'ble Minister, Food and Civil Supplies, State of

Maharashtra, in Second Revision Application No. WAM- 1605/906/1261/NP.21.

In brief, the facts leading to filing of the Petition are

summarised as under :

The petitioner is an Ex-serviceman. The petitioner had

participated in "Operation Vijay" (Kargil). He worked in Armed Forces as Hawildar during the period between 8th April, 1981 and 30th April, 2003. The petitioner met with an accident during "Operation Vijay" (Kargil) and as such he had developed some kind of disability.

The petitioner came to be retired on 30th April, 2003. The Collector office, Osmanabad published notification inviting applications for allotment of ration shops for various villages, including village Deolali on 5th January 2004. The petitioner had submitted an application for allotment of ration shop. The Collector, Osmanabad decided to grant fair price shop in favour of the petitioner, vide his order dated 1 st December 2004. The respondent no.7 preferred a Revision

wp6074-05

against the order of the Collector, Osmanabad granting fair price

shop in favour of the petitioner before Deputy Commissioner (Supply). The Deputy Commissioner (Supply) dismissed the

Revision and upheld the order passed by the Collector, Osmanabad holding that the allotment of fair price shop by the Collector was strictly as per the priority and there was no illegality whatsoever in

the allotment of fair price shop by the Collector, Osmanabad, on 22 nd March, 2005. The respondent no.7 preferred second Revision to Government. The respondent no.2 allowed the second revision

holding that the respondent no.7 was more qualified and Gram

Sabha had recommended his name and he was neither in service nor doing business, vide his judgment and order dated 20 th July,

2005. Being aggrieved by the order dated 20th July, 2005, passed by the respondent no.2, the present petition is filed, seeking interim stay.

2] We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned

AGP for the State and Mr.S.S.Jadhavar, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.7 and perused the impugned order.

3] So far as the factual matrix of the matter is concerned, there is no dispute that pursuant to Government Resolution bearing No.SAVIVYA-1001/Pra.Kra.848/Napu-28 dated 6th March, 2002,

issued by Ministry of Food and Civil Supplies and Consumer Protection, State of Maharashtra has taken policy decision in respect of allotment of fair price shop and laid down criteria for the allotment of fair price shop in non tribal area. As per the said Government Resolution, first preference for allotment of such shop is given to widow or next to kin of defence personnel who died in military action, ex-military personnel, disabled person and project affected person. The priority of allotment of fair price shop to person from the category

wp6074-05

of educated unemployed person has been kept at Sr.No.2. Thus, the

allotment of fair price shop made in favour of the petitioner being an ex-military personnel, cannot be said to be illegal or contrary to policy

decision of the Government. On the contrary, the allotment of shop to petitioner was made strictly in accordance with guidelines laid down by State Government. The District Collector of Osmanabad

has rightly allotted the shop in favour of petitioner.

4] The order of allotment of shop was challenged in revision filed

by respondent no.7 before the Deputy Commissioner (Supply). The

revisional authority has maintained the order of the Collector and dismissed the revision petition holding that the Collector has acted

strictly in accordance with priority laid down by State Government. There was absolutely no case for exercising revisional jurisdiction by the Hon'ble Minister for Food and Civil Supplies. In fact Hon'ble

Minister should not have entertained and interfered with the order passed by respondents no.3 and 4. The reasons assigned by the

Hon'ble Minister are unsustainable in law and beyond the scope of powers of revisional authority. So also the order is contrary to policy

decisions of Government. The allotment was strictly made in accordance with priority fixed by the State Government. There was no scope for interference in exercise of revisional jurisdiction by Hon'ble Minister for Food and Civil Supplies to interfere with the

order passed by the Collector. We are therefore, inclined to allow the petition.

5] Accordingly, we hold that the order passed by Hon'ble Minister is erroneous and against the priority prescribed in Government Resolution dated 6th March, 2002. The petition should therefore succeed. Impugned order of Hon'ble Minister dated 20th July, 2005 is set aside. Earlier order allotting the shop to the petitioner is

wp6074-05

maintained. Petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause "A". Rule

is made absolute in above terms.

              (V.L.ACHLIYA,J.)                  (A.V.NIRGUDE,J.)




                                              
     umg/




                                    
                             
                            
      
   







 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter