Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 943 Bom
Judgement Date : 28 March, 2016
WP/9306/2013
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 9306 OF 2013
Balu s/o Namdeo Patil,
Age : Major years, Occu : Agril.
R/o. Chinchkheda,
Tq. & Dist. Dhule. ..Petitioner
Versus
1 Vandanabai Bhausaheb Desale,
Age : 42 years, Occu : Household,
2 Abhishek Bhausaheb Desale,
Age : 17 years, Occu : Education,
3 Kunal Bhausaheb Desale,
Age : 16 years, Occu : Education,
No.2 and 3 are minor,
U/g. of Vandanabai Bhausaheb Desale,
4 Pradeep Ramesh Desale,
Age : 31 years, Occu : Service.
5 Ramdas s/o Ramesh Desale,
Age : 27 years, Occu : Agril.
6 Vasant s/o Trimbak Desale,
Age : 50 years, Occu : Agril.
7 Rajendra s/o Trimbak Desale,
Died through his L.Rs.
7-A Surekha Rajendra Desale,
Age : 45 years, Occ. Household,
7-B Mayur Rajendra Desale,
Age : 22 years, Occ. Education,
7-C Shubham Rajednra Desale,
Age : 18 years, Occ. Education,
(7-A to 7-C R/o. Chinchkheda,
Tq. & Dist. Dhule.)
8 Gulab s/o Trimbak Desale,
Age : 53 years, Occu ; Agril.
::: Uploaded on - 29/03/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 31/07/2016 10:49:32 :::
WP/9306/2013
2
9 Ramesh s/o Trimbak Patil,
Deceased Through L.Rs.
9-A Mulabai Ramesh Desale,
Age : 45 years, Occu : Household
9-B Vaishali w/o Prasanna Patil,
Age : 26 years, Occu : Agril,
All R/o. Chinchkheda,
Tq. & Dist. Dhule. ..Respondents
...
Advocate for Petitioners : Shri Bhadgaonkar U.A.
Advocate for Respondents : Shri Patni P.F. h/f Shri Desale N.N.
...
ig CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.
Dated: March 28, 2016 ...
ORAL JUDGMENT :-
1. Heard.
2. Rule.
3. By consent, Rule is made returnable forthwith and the petition is
taken up for final disposal.
4. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 25.7.2013 delivered by
the Appeal Court on Application Exhibit 5 in Misc. Civil Appeal No.19 of
2013.
5. I have heard the learned Advocates for the litigating sides for quite
sometime.
WP/9306/2013
6. Considering the fact that the impugned order, which is an
interlocutory order, is in operation from 6.4.2013, not interfered with by
this Court vide order dated 8.5.2013 in Writ Petition No.3900 of 2013 and
has not been stayed by this Court even in this Writ Petition, ends of justice
would be met by directing the Appeal Court to decide the Civil Misc. Appeal
No.19 of 2013 expeditiously.
7. In the light of the above, this petition is disposed off without causing
any interference in the impugned order, but with the direction to the
Appeal Court to decide Civil Misc. Appeal No.19 of 2013 as expeditiously as
possible and preferably on/or before 31.8.2016.
8. Rule stands discharged. No order as to costs.
( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ) ...
akl/d
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!