Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 941 Bom
Judgement Date : 28 March, 2016
wp4364.15 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH
WRIT PETITION NO. 4364 OF 2015
Ku. Trupti d/o Sitaramji Dudhe
(after marriage Mrs. Trupti w/o
Dhananjay Patre) aged 32 years,
occupation - Service, resident of
Ishwar Nagar, Wadgaon,
Yavatmal. ... PETITIONER
Versus
1. Zilla Parishad, Amravati,
through its Chief Executive
Officer.
2. Zilla Parishad, Yavatmal,
through its Chief Executive
Officer.
3. State of Maharashtra
through its Secretary,
Department of Rural
Development, Mantralaya,
Mumbai 400 032.
4. Vijay s/o Jaganlal Gangrale,
aged about 39 years,
occupation - Service, r/o
Nawargaon, Tah. Maregaon,
District - Yavatmal. ... RESPONDENTS
Shri P.D. Meghe, Advocate for the petitioner.
Shri P.B. Patil, Advocate for respondent No. 1.
Shri S.N. Dongre, Advocate holding for Shri Rahul Tajne, Advocate
for respondent No. 2.
Shri C.A. Lokhande, AGP for respondent No. 3.
Shri P.N. Patre, Advocate for respondent No. 4.
.....
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI &
P.N. DESHMUKH, JJ.
MARCH 28, 2016.
ORAL JUDGMENT : (PER B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith and heard
finally with the consent of Shri Meghe, learned counsel for the
petitioner, Shri Patil, learned counsel for respondent No. 1,
Shri Dongre, Advocate holding for Shri Tajne, learned counsel
for respondent No. 2, Shri Lokhande, learned AGP for
respondent No. 3 and Shri Patre, learned counsel for
respondent No. 4.
2. The petitioner seeks a direction to Respondent No.
1 to consider her request for transfer to Respondent No. 2 -
Zilla Parishad, Yavatmal, as against readiness and willingness
of Respondent No. 4 to come to Respondent No. 1 - Zilla
Parishad, Amravati.
3. It appears that the State Government on
31.07.2014 applied its mind to the joint request made by the
petitioner and Respondent No. 4 and directed Respondent No.
1 to consider it favourably. Respondent No. 1 has been asked
to verify certain facts from Respondent No. 4.
4. Shri Patre, learned counsel submits that
Respondent No. 4 is from said area and has knowledge of
Korku language and he is ready to work in that area.
5. In this situation, we find that the interest of justice
can be met with by directing Respondent No. 1 to verify the
facts as directed by Respondent No. 3 - State Government in
its communication dated 31.07.2014 within a period of three
weeks from today. The request for mutual transfer of the
petitioner and Respondent No. 4 shall be looked into and
suitable decision be taken upon it in any case before effecting
regular transfers in the month of April/ May 2016.
6. With these directions, we partly allow and dispose
of the petition. Rule is made absolute in above terms.
However, in the facts and circumstances of the case, there
shall be no order as to costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
******
*GS.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!