Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vidarbha Irrigation Development ... vs Sundrabai Wd/O Ragho Rathod & Ors
2016 Latest Caselaw 911 Bom

Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 911 Bom
Judgement Date : 23 March, 2016

Bombay High Court
Vidarbha Irrigation Development ... vs Sundrabai Wd/O Ragho Rathod & Ors on 23 March, 2016
Bench: Ravi K. Deshpande
                                                        1               fa698.06.odt

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                             NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR




                                                                                     
                                                             
                                   FIRST APPEAL NO. 698 of 2006


                Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation,




                                                            
                through Executive Engineer,
                Minor Irrigation Division No.2 
                Akola                                     APPELLANT




                                              
                                       ...VERSUS...

     1]
                             
                Sundrabai wd/o Ragho Rathod,
                aged 60 years, Occ. Nil.
                            
     2]         Harishchandra Ragho Rathod,
                aged about 40 years, Occ. Nil

     3]         Mulchand Ragho Rathod,
      

                aged about 40 years, Occ. Nil
   



     4]         Devidas Ragho Rathod,
                aged 36 years, Occ. Nil.

     5]         Sau. Maina Kailash Chauhan,





                aged about 34 years, Occ. Household.

     6]         Mathura Ragho Rathod,
                aged about 26 years, Occ. Nil.





                All 1 to 4 and 6 R/o. Padsinghi,
                Tq. Patur, Distt. Akola, and No.5
                R/o. Mandwa, Tq. Mehkar, Distt. Buldhana.

     7]      The State of Maharashtra,
             through Collector, Akola ......                             RESPONDENTS
     -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Shri A.B.Patil, Advocate, for appellant.
     Shri M.A.Kadu, AGP for Respondent no. 7
     None for other respondents.
     -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    ::: Uploaded on - 30/03/2016                             ::: Downloaded on - 31/07/2016 10:06:59 :::
                                                              2                fa698.06.odt

                               CORAM: R. K. DESHPANDE, J.

rd DATE : 23 MARCH, 2016 .

ORAL JUDGMENT

1] The matter is taken up for final hearing at the

request of the learned counsel appearing for the appellant

who has invited my attention to the common judgment and

order passed by this Court on 24.01.2013 in First Appeal No.

293 of 2006 and other connected matters and submits that

the same order can govern the controversy involved in the

present case.

2] In the present case, the operative portion of the

order passed by the Reference Court on 19.04.2006 in Land

Acquisition Case No. 52 of 1994 is reproduced below.

i] The reference is hereby party allowed with cost.

ii] The price of the land is fixed at Rs.15,000/- per acre with 5% per annum increase in the market value from the date of notification.

Iii] The respondents are directed to pay the difference of the amount of compensation within three months from the date of receipt of this award along with 30% solatium and other benefits available under the Land Acquisition Act.



              3]               This   Court   has   in   the   judgment   delivered   on




                                                               3                 fa698.06.odt

24.01.2013 passed in First Appeal No. 293 of 2006 clarified

the judgment in paragraph No.3 as under;.

"3. It is held that the claimant shall be entitled to the price of the land at Rs.16,500/- per acre for the acquired land with all statutory benefits under the Land Acquisition Act regarding solatium and other

benefits. The appeal is, thus dismissed with no order as to costs."

4] The present appeal is, therefore, disposed of

holding that the claimants shall be entitled to price of the land

at the rate of Rs.16,500/- per acre for the acquired land with

all statutory benefits under the Land Acquisition Act including

solatium and other benefits.

The appeal stands disposed of with this

modification. No order as to costs.

JUDGE

Rvjalit

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter