Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 758 Bom
Judgement Date : 18 March, 2016
1 apl196.16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 196 OF 2016
Nilesh Sharad Gaddewar,
aged about 33 years, Occupation
Doctor at GMC, R/o Plot No.411,
Honey Archana Complex, Near
Raymond Showroom, Ajni, Nagpur. ... APPLICANT
VERSUS
1. State of Maharashtra,
through PSO, Sadar, Nagpur.
2. Aparna d/o Harish Vanjari
(maiden name)
Smt. Aparna w/o Himanshu Bhimte,
aged about 29 years, R/o. Plot No.204,
Pravin Plaza, Nari Ring Road, Power
Greed, Jaripatka, Nagpur - 26. ... RESPONDENTS
....
Shri Y.B. Mandpe, Advocate for the applicant.
Ms. R.V. Kaliya, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1.
Shri N.K. Maras, Advocate for respondent No.2.
....
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND
PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ.
DATED : 18TH MARCH, 2016.
ORAL JUDGMENT : (Per B.R. Gavai, J.)
Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. The application is heard
finally with the consent of the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the
respective parties.
2 apl196.16
2. By way of present application, the applicant approaches this
Court for quashing and setting aside the FIR bearing No. 335/2014 registered
by respondent No.1 for the offence punishable under Sections 279, 337, 427
of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 134, 177 of the Motor Vehicles
Act and subsequent proceedings by way of SCC No. 28283/2014.
3. The FIR in question came to be lodged on the basis of the
complaint of respondent No.2 that when she was travelling from
Dharampeth towards High Court on Moped, one vehicle which was
travelling rashly and in negligent manner from CP Club towards Zero Mile,
gave dash to her Moped thereby causing injury to her and her sister.
4. The applicant as well as respondent No.2 are personally present
in the Court. It is submitted that the dispute has been amicably settled
between the parties and that the respondent No.2 does not wish to proceed
further with the criminal proceedings.
5. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Madan Mohan Abbot .v.
State of Punjab (reported in 2008(4) SCC, 582) has held that if the parties
have settled the dispute, no useful purpose would be served in continuing
with the proceedings in which no element of public and criminal law is
involved in the nature of the allegations made against the applicant. To give
an end to the criminal proceedings where no element of public and criminal
law is involved in the present matter, this Court can exercise the powers
under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
3 apl196.16
6. In the result, the Criminal Application stands disposed of in view
of the amicable settlement arrived at between the parties. Rule is, therefore,
made absolute in terms of prayer clause (1).
JUDGE JUDGE
*rrg.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!