Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kiran @ Sawali Sachin Nagawkar vs Sachin Chandrakant Nagawkar
2016 Latest Caselaw 350 Bom

Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 350 Bom
Judgement Date : 4 March, 2016

Bombay High Court
Kiran @ Sawali Sachin Nagawkar vs Sachin Chandrakant Nagawkar on 4 March, 2016
Bench: S.P. Deshmukh
                                                   1                         MCA-111.15


                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,




                                                                                    
                             BENCH AT AURANGABAD




                                                            
              MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 111 OF 2015


     Sau Kiran Alias Sawali w/o Sachin Nagawkar
     Age: 24 yrs. Occu. Household,




                                                           
     r/o c/o Sopan Dhanaji Gholap
     Kanchan Nagar, Jalgaon, Tq. And Dist. Jalgaon.                  ... APPLICANT

              Versus




                                                
     Sachin Chandrakant Nagawkar
     Age: 30 yrs. Occu. Service
     r/o 304, Shivkamal Heightsig
     C.H.S. Plot No.51, Sector 20,
     Kamothe, New Mumbai                                             ... RESPONDENT
                             
                                      .....
     Mr. Sachin A. Pradhan, Advocate for applicant
     Mr. S. S. Londhe, Advocate for respondent
                                      .....
      
   



                                        CORAM :        SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.
                                          DATE :       4th MARCH, 2016





     ORAL JUDGMENT :



1. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of

the parties.

2. After hearing learned advocates for the parties for some

time, it transpires that the respondent has no serious objection for

transfer of the proceedings as sought under the present

miscellaneous civil application.

2 MCA-111.15

3. In view of the same, I deem it expedient and appropriate to

allow the miscellaneous civil application.

4. Accordingly, miscellaneous civil application is allowed in

terms of prayer clause (B) and stands disposed of. Rule is made

absolute accordingly.

                              ig         ( SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J. )
                            
      


     sms
     ***
   







 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter