Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Anna Madhavrao Jadhav vs The State Of Maharashtra And ...
2016 Latest Caselaw 216 Bom

Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 216 Bom
Judgement Date : 1 March, 2016

Bombay High Court
Anna Madhavrao Jadhav vs The State Of Maharashtra And ... on 1 March, 2016
Bench: R.M. Borde
                                                                        wp793.16
                                            1


                                            




                                                                          
          IN  THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD




                                                  
                           WRIT PETITION NO.793 OF 2016




                                                 
     Anna s/o Madhavrao Jadhav,
     Age-29 years, Occu:Service,
     R/o-Kumbhari, Tq-Bhokardan,




                                         
     Dist-Jalna.
                                     ...PETITIONER
                             
            VERSUS             
                            
     1) The State of Maharashtra,
        Tribal Development Department,
        Through its Secretary,
        Mantralaya, Mumbai-32,
      


     2) The Scheduled Tribe Certificate
   



        Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad,
        Through its Deputy Director/Member,

     3) The Chief Executive Officer,





        Zilla Parishad, Jalna,

     4) The Deputy Chief Executive Officer,
        (Panchayatraj), Zilla Parishad,
        Jalna,





     5) The Block Development Officer,
        Panchayat Samittee, Mantha,
        Tq-Mantha, Dist-Jalna.   
                                     ...RESPONDENTS




    ::: Uploaded on - 14/03/2016                  ::: Downloaded on - 31/07/2016 07:25:13 :::
                                                                  wp793.16
                                     2


                          ...




                                                                   
       Mr.P.V. Jadhavar Advocate for  Petitioner.
       Mr.A.B. Girase, A.G.P. for Respondent 
       Nos.1 & 2.




                                           
       Mr.S.S. Tope Advocate for Respondent Nos.3 to 5. 
                          ...

                   CORAM:   R.M. BORDE AND




                                          
                            A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.

DATE : 1ST MARCH, 2016

ORAL JUDGMENT [PER R.M. BORDE, J.] :

1.

Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable

forthwith. With the consent of learned counsel for

the parties, the Petition is taken up for final

disposal at admissions stage.

2. The Petitioner claims to belong to "Koli

Malhar", Scheduled Tribe. He has been appointed on

the post of Contractual Gram Sevak as against

vacancy ear-marked for Scheduled Tribe, by order

dated 27th August 2009. The Petitioner joined the

services as Contractual Gram Sevak and has

completed three years tenure on 26th August 2012.

Since the Petitioner has been appointed as against

wp793.16

reserved vacancy, the tribe certificate issued to

him has been referred to the Scrutiny Committee

for verification, and the proposal is stated to be

pending.

3. In the facts of this case, the Respondent

No.2 - Scrutiny Committee is directed to take

decision on the tribe certificate verification

claim of the Petitioner pending with the Scrutiny

Committee as expeditiously as possible, and

preferably within period of EIGHT MONTHS from

today.

4. The Petitioner has successfully completed

three years tenure as Contractual Gram Sevak and

the Block Development Officer has recommended, on

13th April 2015, to absorb the Petitioner in the

cadre of Gram Sevak. In terms of order of

appointment, the services of the Petitioner are

liable to be regularized as Gram Sevak after

completion of three years tenure as Contractual

wp793.16

Gram Sevak. In the instant matter, since the

Petitioner has completed three years tenure as

Contractual Gram Sevak on 26th August 2012,

Respondent Nos.3 to 5 are directed to regularize

the services of the Petitioner as Gram Sevak,

provisionally, subject to the decision on the

validation claim pending with the Scrutiny

Committee. The Petitioner shall be paid salary in

the pay-scale prescribed for Gram Sevak on and

after 27th August 2012.

5. The arrears shall be paid to the

Petitioner as expeditiously as possible,

preferably within period of SIX MONTHS from today.

6. Rule is accordingly made absolute in above

terms. There shall be no order as to costs.

[A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.] [R.M. BORDE, J.] asb/MAR16

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter