Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Alkabai Prabhakar Patil And ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And ...
2016 Latest Caselaw 2920 Bom

Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 2920 Bom
Judgement Date : 16 June, 2016

Bombay High Court
Alkabai Prabhakar Patil And ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And ... on 16 June, 2016
Bench: R.M. Borde
                                             {1}
                                                                          7915.14 wp.odt

                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY




                                                                                
                            BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                          WRIT PETITION NO.7915 OF 2014




                                                     
     1        Alkabai w/o Prabhakar Patil,
              age: 36 years, occu: Agril.




                                                    
     2        Radheshyam S/o Prabhakar Patil
              age: 23 years, occu: Agril. & Education
              Both R/o Chabutrae Post : Dhulpimpri
              Tq. Parola, Dist. Jalgaon                                    Petitioners




                                        
              Versus


     1
                             
              The State of Maharashtra
              Through Its Secretary of
              Irrigation & Water Supply Department,
                            
              & Rural Development Dept.
              Mantralaya, Mumbai 32

     2        The Divisional Commissioner,
              Nasik Division, Nasik
      


     3        The Collector Jalgaon
              Dist. Jalgaon
   



     4        Special Land Acquisition Officer (M.I.)
              Collector Office, Jalgaon





     5        Dy. Collector (E.G.C.)
              Jalgaon

     6        Tahsildar, Parola
              Dist. Jalgaon





     7        The Chief Executive Officer,
              Zillha Parishad, Jalgaon

     8        Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation &
              Construction Department (Local level)
              Jalgaon

     9        Sub Divisional Officer, Minor Irrigation
              (Water) Sub Division, Jalgaon                                Respondents

{2} 7915.14 wp.odt

Mr.P.B. Patil advocate for the petitioners Mr. M.B. Bharaswadkar, Assistant Government Pleader for the State Mrs. Chaitali Kutti, advocate for respondent Nos.7 to 9

_______________

CORAM : R.M. BORDE &

K.L.WADANE, JJ

(Date : 16 th June, 2016 .)

ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: R.M. Borde, J) 1 Heard.

2 Rule. With the consent of the parties, petition is taken up

for final decision at admission stage.

3 The land belonging to the petitioners out of Gut No.23/5

and 23/6 is affected as a result of construction of percolation

tank. It is the contention of the petitioners that the village

percolation tank is constructed some ten years back in 2006 and

the land belonging to the petitioners has been utilised. The

petitioners approached the respondent authorities with a request

to initiate the land acquisition proceedings and determine the

amount of compensation and pay the same to the petitioners.

However, their request has not been considered. As such, they

have approached this Court seeking directions to the respondents

{3} 7915.14 wp.odt

to determine and pay the compensation.

4 An affidavit in reply has been presented on behalf of

respondent No.9 wherein, it has been stated that the land to the

extent of 2 H belonging to the petitioners situate in village Umbre,

Taluka Parola is submerged in village tank. It is further stated that

a proposal was not forwarded since the construction of the tank

was taken up under ' Sampurna Gramin Rojgar Yojna '. It is

further stated that, the proposal for determination of the amount

of compensation will be forwarded to the Collector within a period

of three months from today.

5 In view of the statement, respondent No.9 is directed to

tender proposal for determination of the amount of compensation

in respect of submerged land belonging to the petitioner to the

Collector, within a period of three months from today. On receipt

of the proposal, the Collector shall take steps for determination of

amount of compensation and ensure the payment of the amount

to the petitioners, as expeditiously as possible and preferably

within a period of one year from the date of receipt of the

proposal. Other respondents, including the acquiring body shall

ensure compliance of the order in respect of payment of

compensation, as directed above.

{4} 7915.14 wp.odt

6 Rule is made absolute accordingly.

     7        There shall be no order as to costs.




                                                  
                  (K.L.WADANE, J)                    (R.M.BORDE, J)




                                      
     vbd

                             
                            
      
   







 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter