Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 33 Bom
Judgement Date : 24 February, 2016
1 wp1733.14.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 1733 OF 2014
Lalgir Onkargir Gosavi,
aged about 70 years, Occupation :
Labourer, R/o. Sangrampur,
Tq. Sangrampur, Distt. Buldana ...... PETITIONER
...VERSUS...
1]
Deputy Director of Land Records,
Amravati Division, Amravati.
2] Superintendent of Land Records,
Buldana, Tq. And Distt. Buldana.
3] Shriram Narhi Sawatkar,
Aged about Adult;
4] Dattatyraya Namdev Sirsole,
(since deceased) through Legal Heirs;
4-i] Smt. Kamla Dattatraya Sirsole,
aged 70 years,
4-ii] Asha Narendra Bhagvat,
aged 35 years,
4-iii] Sanjay Dattatraya Sirsole,
aged 50 years,
4-iv] Sham Dattatraya Sirsole,
aged 45 years,
4-v] Gajanan Dattatraya Sirsole,
aged 42 yeas,
4-vi] Pandurang Dattatraya Sirsole,
aged about 37 years,
::: Uploaded on - 25/02/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 31/07/2016 06:30:23 :::
2 wp1733.14.odt
Respondent Nos. 3 to [4-vi] resident
of Sangrampur, Tq. Sangrampur,
Distt. Buldhana RESPONDENTS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shri K.S.Narwade, counsel for Petitioner.
Smt. Rashi Deshpande, AGP, for R-1 and 2
Shri S.V.Sohoni, counsel for Respondent nos. 4-i to 4-vi
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM: R. K. DESHPANDE, J.
th DATE : 24 FEBRUARY, 2016 .
ORAL JUDGMENT
1] Rule made returnable forthwith.
Heard learned counsels appearing for the
parties.
2] The order impugned in this petition is dated
05.11.2012, passed by the Deputy Director of Land Records
in Preliminary Hearing Notice No. 108 of 2011, dismissing the
matter in default and refusing to grant restoration of appeal
preferred under Section 247 of the Maharashtra Land
Revenue Code.
3] With the assistance of the learned counsels
appearing for the parties, I have gone through the appeal as
well as the application for restoration of appeal. After going
3 wp1733.14.odt
through the documents, I am satisfied that the case was
made out for restoration of the matter for the decision on
merits in accordance with law. The impugned order cannot,
therefore, be sustained.
4] In the result, writ petition is allowed. The order
dated 05.11.2012 passed by the Deputy Director of Land
Records is hereby quashed and set aside and the appeal
styled as Preliminary Hearing Notice No. 108 of 2011 is
restored. No order as to cost.
Rule is made absolute in above terms. No orders as to
costs.
JUDGE
Rvjalit
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!