Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Prabhu Dattatraya Totewad vs The State Of Maharashtra And ...
2016 Latest Caselaw 7572 Bom

Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 7572 Bom
Judgement Date : 21 December, 2016

Bombay High Court
Prabhu Dattatraya Totewad vs The State Of Maharashtra And ... on 21 December, 2016
Bench: R.M. Borde
                                          {1}
                                                                    wp 12612.16.odt

                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY




                                                                           
                            BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                         WRIT PETITION NO.12612 OF 2016




                                                   
     Prabhu Dattatraya Totewad,
     age: 25 years, ccu: nil
     R/o Bitnal, Tq. Umri,
     Dist. Nanded                                                   Petitioner




                                                  
              Versus


     1        The State of Maharashtra,




                                      
              Through it's Secretary,
              General Administration Department,
              Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32
                             
     2        The Scheduled Tribe Certificate
              Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad
                            
              through Its Deputy Director (R)

     3        The Manager,
              Government Photozinko Press
              & Book Depot,
      

              Pune 411 001                                      Respondents

Mr.A.V. Indrale Patil advocate for the petitioner Mr.S.P. Tiwari, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondents _______________

CORAM : R.M. BORDE & SANGITRAO S. PATIL , JJ

(Date : 21st December, 2016.)

ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: R.M. Borde, J)

1 Heard.

2 Rule. With the consent of the parties, petition is taken up

for final decision at admission stage.

{2} wp 12612.16.odt

3 The petitioner claims to belong to Mannervarlu Caste and is

in receipt of the tribe certificate issued by the Competent

Authority. He has been selected for the post of Parichar Pratirup in

Government Press & Depot. However, on account of his inability to

furnish validation certificate, the order of appointment has not

been issued by the employer i.e. respondent No.3. He is called

upon by communication dated 2.11.2016 to tender the caste

certificate along with supporting documents. The petitioner

tendered necessary documents in support of his claim which have

been forwarded by respondent No.3 to the scrutiny committee on

18.11.2016. The petitioner claims that, in view of the Policy of the

State Government declared on 12.11.2011 as well as the decision

of the High Court in Writ Petition No.2136 of 2011 decided on

25.8.2011, the petitioner shall have to be issued provisional order

of appointment, subject to submission of an undertaking by the

petitioner to submit validation certificate within specified period.

The respondent employer, overlooking the directions issued by the

Government in that regard, referred to above, has refused to

issue order of appointment. As such the petitioner has approached

this Court.

4 In view of the facts stated as above, this petition can be

disposed of by issuing direction to respondent No.2 to take

{3} wp 12612.16.odt

decision on the tribe certificate verification proposal of the

petitioner, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a

period of one year from today and it is accordingly directed. In

the meanwhile, respondent No.3 shall issue provisional order of

appointment, subject to furnishing of an undertaking by the

petitioner to the effect that he would submit validation certificate

within a period of one year from today and in the event of his

failure to submit validation certificate and in the event of rejection

of his claim by the scrutiny committee, the order of appointment

issued to the petitioner shall be liable to be withdrawn with

retrospective effect. The respondent No.3 employer shall issue

necessary orders of provisional appointment subject to tendering

of an undertaking by the petitioner, as referred to above, within

six weeks from today.

     5        Rule is accordingly made absolute.




             (SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J)                     (R.M.BORDE, J)





     vbd





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter