Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 6975 Bom
Judgement Date : 6 December, 2016
jdk 1 1.crwp.3906.16.j.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3906 OF 2016
Kailas Bhairoba Sarole ]
C-630, Yerawada Central Prison, Pune ].. Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra ].. Respondent
....
Mrs. Rohini Dandekar Advocate appointed for Petitioner
Mr. Arfan Sait A.P.P. for the State
....
CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI AND
A.M.BADAR, JJ.
DATED : DECEMBER 06, 2016
ORAL JUDGMENT : [PER SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J. ]:
1 Heard both sides.
2 The petitioner preferred an application for parole on
the ground of illness of his grand-mother. The said application
came to be rejected on 24.8.2016, hence, this petition.
3 The application of the petitioner came to be rejected
1 of 3
jdk 2 1.crwp.3906.16.j.doc
only on two grounds. The first ground is that the surety Shri.
Rama Bhima Sarole suggested by the petitioner, is full time
busy in his work i.e. running of foot-wear shop, hence, he would
not be able to keep a check on the petitioner. The second
ground is that if the petitioner is released on parole, there is
possibility of law and order problem.
4 As far as the first ground is concerned, the report of
the Senior Police Inspector, Sahkar Nagar Police Station, Pune
dated 19.4.2016 shows that earlier on six occasions, the
petitioner was released on furlough and on all the occasions,
the petitioner had surrendered back to the prison in time. The
report further shows that on all these occasions, same surety
i.e. Rama Bhima Sarole has stood as surety when the
petitioner was released earlier. During the period that the
petitioner was released earlier, though the same person i.e.
Shri. Rama Bhima Sarole has stood as surety, there was no
complaint from anyone against the petitioner. Moreover,
during the period that the petitioner was released on furlough
or parole, the petitioner had not committed any offence or
come to the adverse notice of the police, hence, we find no
2 of 3
jdk 3 1.crwp.3906.16.j.doc
merit in the first ground of rejection.
5 As far as the second ground of rejection is concerned,
also we find no merit because, on the earlier occasions when
the petitioner was released on parole or furlough, he has
reported back in time. Moreover, during the period that the
petitioner was released on furlough or parole, the petitioner
had not committed any offence or come to the adverse notice
of the police.
Looking to all these facts, we are inclined to
grant parole.
6 The petitioner to be released on parole on the usual
terms and conditions as set out by the competent authority.
Petition is allowed. Rule is made absolute in above terms.
7 Office to communicate this order to the petitioner
who is in Yerawada Central Prison, Pune.
[ A.M.BADAR, J.] [ SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. ]
kandarkar
3 of 3
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!