Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 6970 Bom
Judgement Date : 6 December, 2016
901_WP1122916.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 11229 OF 2016
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 15843 OF 2016
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 11229 OF 2016
Pandharinath Gyanaba Kadam
Age: 65 years, Occu.: Agriculture,
R/o Sonna, Tq. Purna, Dist. Parbhani. ..PETITIONER
VERSUS
1. State of Maharashtra
Through its Principal Secretary,
Co-operative and Textile Department,
Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32.
2. The District Co-operative Election Officer/
District Deputy Registrar,
Co-operative Societies, Parbhani.
3. The Assistant Registrar,
Co-operative Societies, Puna,
Tq. Purna, Dist. Parbhani.
4. The Returning Officer,
Sonna Vividh Karyakari Sahakari Society,
Sonna, Tq. Purna, Dist. Parbhani.
5. Sonna Vividh Karyakari Sahakari Society,
Sonna, Tq. Purna, Dist. Parbhani.
Through its Secretary.
6. Baliram Shankarrao Kadam
R/o Sonna, Tq. Purna, Dist. Parbhani. ..RESPONDENTS
....
1 / 3
::: Uploaded on - 07/12/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 08/12/2016 01:04:48 :::
901_WP1122916.odt
Mr. P.D. Bachate, Advocate for petitioner.
Mr. S.K. Tambe, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1.
Mr. S.K. Kadam, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 to 4.
Mr. S.B. Ghatol Patil, Advocate for Respondent No.6.
....
CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE, J.
DATED : 06th DECEMBER, 2016
ORAL JUDGMENT :
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard both sides by
consent for final disposal.
2 The petition is filed to challenge the order made by the
Returning Officer by which the names of 58 persons were deleted from
the provisional voters list and also the decision given by the Assistant
Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Purna that there is no relevant record
on the basis of which it can be said that those 58 persons were made
members. The order is made against these persons.
3. The submissions made show that in the audit conducted for
the year 2012-13, the record was verified by the auditor. The names of
four members like Vandana Manik Kadam, Santabai Manchak Kadam,
Govind Vyankati Kadam and Waman Digambar Lokhande were shown in
the audit report but their names are deleted by observing that there is no
2 / 3
901_WP1122916.odt
relevant record. The auditor must have mentioned these four names on
the basis of the relevant record which the auditor is expected to go
through.
4. In view of these circumstances, this Court holds that to some
extent, the petition can be allowed. Voters list is to be corrected by
adding aforesaid four names and they are allowed to vote in the election.
Rule made absolute. Respondent No.2 is to correct the voters list. Civil
application stands disposed of.
( T.V. NALAWADE, J. ) SSD
3 / 3
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!