Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 6868 Bom
Judgement Date : 1 December, 2016
suresh 904-WP-1622.2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1622 OF 2016
M/s. Aegis Limited,
a Company incorporated under the
Companies Act, 1956, having its
office at Essar House, 11, K.K. Marg,
Mahalaxmi, Mumbai-400 034. .... Petitioner
- Versus -
1. The Union of India
through Secretary,
Ministry of Finance,
North Block, New Delhi.
2. The Central Board of Direct Taxes
through the Secretary,
Department of Revenue,
Ministry of Finance,
Government of India,
Central Secretariat, North Block,
New Delhi-110 001.
3. The Additional Commissioner of
Income Tax 6(1), having his
office at 5th Floor, Aayakar
Bhawan, M.K. Road,
Mumbai-400 020.
4. The Deputy Commissioner of Income
Tax 6(1), having his office at
Aayakar Bhawan, M.K. Road,
Mumbai-400 020. .... Respondents
Page 1 of 3
::: Uploaded on - 07/12/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 08/12/2016 00:12:17 :::
suresh 904-WP-1622.2016.doc
Mr. Deepak Chopra with Mr. Jas Sanghavi, Ms Manasvini
Bajpai and Mr. Aseem Mewar i/by M/s. PDS Legal for
the Petitioner.
Mr. Anil C. Singh, Additional Solicitor General, with
Mr. A.R. Malhotra, Ms Geetika Gandhi and Ms C.S. Xavier
for the Respondents.
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI &
B.P. COLABAWALLA, JJ.
ig DATE : DECEMBER 01, 2016
ORAL JUDGMENT (Per Shri S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.):
1. The facts of this case and the issues raised being
similar to those in Original Side Writ Petition No.1619 of 2016
{M/s. Aegis Limited Vs. The Union of India & 3 others} and
the said writ petition having been disposed of for the reasons
recorded in our Judgment passed today, this writ petition is also
disposed of in the following terms:-
2. We direct that the refund application of the
petitioner pending with the Department shall be processed by
the Competent Authority, namely, respondent No.4, as
expeditiously as possible and in accordance with law.
suresh 904-WP-1622.2016.doc
3. We grant two weeks' time for the same. The time to
commence from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
4. We clarify that we have expressed no opinion on the
merits of the refund application. This application shall be dealt
with in accordance with law.
5. Once we direct disposal of the refund application,
needless to clarify that the Refund application pertaining to the
Assessment Year 2015-16 shall be processed and disposed of in
terms of our directions.
6. Rule is made absolute in the above terms. There will
be no order as to costs
(B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!