Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 5067 Bom
Judgement Date : 30 August, 2016
1 wp 4773.03.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY :
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION No. 4773/2003
1] Postal Accounts & Audit Pensioners'
Association, Nagpur, A Society registered
under section 21 of the Society's Act 1860,
having registration no.MAH/P67/94/NAG
dated 3/6/1994, having its office at
"Tirthrup" 63, Dharampeth Society's Layout No.3,
Deendayalnagar, Nagpur, Tahsil and District Nagpur,
through its Secretary D.V. Dhaktod.
2] Ramesh s/o Tanbaji Bhuwan,
Retired Senior Accountant,
Office of the Director of Accounts (Postal),
Nagpur, R/o.-Nagjibhai Town, Sitabuldi, Nagpur.
3] Madhukar Narayanrao Bokade,
Retired Senior Accountant,
Office of the Director of Accounts (Postal),
Nagpur r/o 62, Dharampeth Society Layout,
Deendayal Nagar, Nagpur-22. PETITIONERS
.....VERSUS.....
1] Union of India,
Ministry of Communication,
Department of Posts, Dak Bhavan,
New Delhi 110 001, through Director General.
2] Director of Accounts (Postal),
Civil Lines, Nagpur- 440 001. R
ESPONDENTS
None for the petitioners.
Ms U.R. Tanna, Advocate for the respondent nos.1 and 2.
Coram : Smt. Vasanti A Naik &
Kum. Indira Jain, JJ.
Dated : 30 August, 2016.
th
ORAL JUDGMENT (Per Smt. Vasanti A Naik, J.)
2 wp 4773.03.odt
By this Writ Petition the petitioners, have sought a direction against the
respondents to implement the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal
dated 23-09-2002 in Original Application No.716 of 1998. The petitioners
have sought a direction against the respondents to fix the pay scale of the
petitioners on the basis of the order in Original Application No.716 of 1998.
Ms Tanna, the learned Counsel for the respondents states that the
Writ Petition is liable to be dismissed as the orders passed by the Central
Administrative Tribunal in several Original Applications directing the re-
fixation of the salary are set aside by this Court by the judgment dated
25-01-2007 in Writ Petition Nos.1686 of 2003 and 1733 of 2003. It is stated
that since the claim of the petitioners was based on the orders of the Central
Administrative Tribunal in Original Application Nos.716 of 1998 and 605 of
1997 and since the said orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal are set
aside by this Court by the judgment dated 25-01-2007, the Writ Petition is
liable to be dismissed. It is stated that the claim of the petitioners was based
on the orders passed by the Tribunal in the two aforesaid Original Applications
and since the orders in the two aforesaid Original Applications are set aside,
the petition is liable to be dismissed.
We had called for the record and proceedings in Writ Petition Nos.
1686 of 2003 and 1733 of 2003 and perused the judgment rendered by this
Court on 25-01-2007.
3 wp 4773.03.odt
Hence, for the reasons recorded in the judgment dated 25-01-2007 in
Writ Petition Nos. 1686 of 2003 and 1733 of 2003, we dismiss the Writ
Petition with no order as to costs. Rule stands discharged.
JUDGE JUD
GE
Deshmukh
4 wp 4773.03.odt
C E R T I F I C A T E
"I certify that this Judgment uploaded is a true
and correct copy of original signed Judgment."
Uploaded by : Uploaded on :
(Deshmukh) 02/09/2016
P.A. to the Hon'ble Judge.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!