Nagesh Dharmaraj Tambud vs Sub Divisional Officer Majalgaon ...
2016 Latest Caselaw 4985 Bom

                                          {1}
                                                                      wp 8944.16.odt

                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY




                                                                            
                            BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                          WRIT PETITION NO.8944 OF 2016




                                                    
     Nagesh S/o Dharmaraj Tambud
     Age:23 years, occu: service,




                                                   
     R/o Kasare, Tq.Dharur,
     Dist. Beed                                                         Petitioner


              Versus




                                      
     Sub Divisional Officer, 
     Majalgaon, Tq. Majalgaon
     Dist. Beed                                                       Respondent

Mr.S.S. Phatale advocate for the petitioner Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar, Assistant Govt. Pleader for Respondent _______________

CORAM : R.M. BORDE &

K.K. SONAWANE, JJ

(Date : 25th August, 2016.)

ORAL JUDGMENT

(Per: R.M. Borde, J)

1 Rule.

2 With the consent of the parties, petition is taken up for final

decision at admission stage.

3 An application tendered by the petitioner for issuance of

{2} wp 8944.16.odt

caste certificate has been turned down by the Sub-Divisional

Officer, Majalgaon.

4 The petitioner contends that, his father is a caste validity

certificate holder and has been issued validity certificate by the

Competent Scrutiny committee. In this view of the matter, there

is no impediment for the Sub-Divisional Officer to issue caste

certificate, as requested by the petitioner.

5 In this view of the matter, the order impugned in this

petition, passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Majalgoan on

2.8.2016 is quashed and set aside and the respondent is directed

to issue caste certificate, as requested by the petitioner, as

expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of two

weeks from today.

6 Rule is made absolute accordingly.

7 There shall be no order as to costs.

(K.K. SONAWANE, J) (R.M.BORDE, J)

vbd