Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 4982 Bom
Judgement Date : 25 August, 2016
WP 2160/15 1 Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION No. 2160/2015
Ku. Prachi d/o Sambhaji Gaykawad,
Aged about 18 yrs., Occ.-Student,
R/o Plot No. 31, Dubey Nagar E,
Hudkeswar Road, Nagpur. PETITIONER
.....VERSUS.....
1. The Schedule Tribe Certificate
Scrutiny Committee, Gadchiroli Division,
Nagpur Adivasi Vikas Bhavan, Third Floor,
Giripeth, Amravati Road, Nagpur.
Through Its Joint Commissioner.
2. The Director of Technical Education,
Maharashtra State, Mumbai,
3, Mahapalika Marg, Elphinston Technical
High School Campus, Mumbai.
3. The Principal,
Yeshwantrao Chavan College of Engineering,
Wanadongari, Hingna Road, Nagpur. RESPONDENTS
Shri S.D. Malke, counsel for the petitioner.
Shri P.S. Tembhare, Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent nos.1 and 2.
Shri Arvind Dubey holding for Shri P.D. Meghe, counsel for the respondent no.3.
CORAM :SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND
KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ.
DATE : 25 TH AUGUST, 2016.
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER : SMT.VASANTI A NAIK, J.)
RULE. Rule made returnable forthwith. The petition is heard
finally at the stage of admission with the consent of the learned counsel
for the parties.
2. By this writ petition, the petitioner seeks a direction against
the respondent no.1-Scrutiny Committee to decide the caste claim of the
petitioner, at the earliest. The petitioner seeks a direction against the
respondent no.3 to protect the education of the petitioner till her caste
claim is decided.
WP 2160/15 2 Judgment
3. Shri Tembhare, the learned Assistant Government Pleader
appearing on behalf of the respondent no.1-Scrutiny Committee, states on
instructions from the Committee that the caste claim of the petitioner is
pending and the same would be decided as early as possible.
4. In view of the aforesaid statement, it would be necessary
to allow the writ petition and protect the education of the petitioner as
the petitioner was not at fault in not producing the caste validity
certificate. We allow the writ petition and direct the respondent no.1-
Scrutiny Committee to decide the caste claim of the petitioner within
fifteen months. Since the petitioner was not at fault in not producing the
caste validity certificate, the education of the petitioner is protected till
her caste claim is decided. This would mean that the petitioner should be
permitted to attend the classes, appear at the examination and the result
of the petitioner should be declared till her caste claim is decided.
Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms with no order as
to costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
APTE
WP 2160/15 3 Judgment
CERTIFICATE
I certify that this Judgment/Order uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed Judgment/Order.
Uploaded by: Rohit D. Apte. Uploaded on : 26.08.2016.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!