Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 4692 Bom
Judgement Date : 16 August, 2016
1 wp3787.16.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.3787 OF 2016
Ashok s/o. Manikrao Suradkar,
Aged Nil, Occ. Service, r/o.
Raipur, Post Kolara, Tq.Chikhali,
Distt. Buldhana-443201. .......... PETITIONER
// VERSUS //
1. Scheduled Tribe Scrutiny Committee,
Through its Member/Secretary,
Amravati.
2. Shri Sharad Shikshan Va Yuvak
Kalyan Sanstha, Chikhali,
Distt. Buldhana, Through its
President.
3. Principal,
Kala Mahavidyalaya,
Buldhana, Distt. Buldhana. .......... RESPONDENTS
::: Uploaded on - 18/08/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 19/08/2016 00:27:17 :::
2 wp3787.16.odt
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Mr.R.D.Karode, Adv. for the petitioner.
Mr.Amit Balpande, AGP for respondent.
Mr.A.A.Mirza, Adv. for respondent nos. 2 and 3.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI &
V. M. DESHPANDE, JJ.
DATE : 16.8.2016.
ORAL JUDGMENT (Per B.R.Gavai, J) :
1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard by
consent.
2. By way of present petition, the petitioner has prayed for
protection of his services.
3. The petitioner was appointed on 17th September, 1996
on the post of Peon against the post reserved for a Scheduled Tribe
category candidate. The petitioner claimed to be belonging to the
'Koli Mahadeo' caste, which is recognized as a Scheduled Tribe.
However, it appears that the claim of the petitioner came to be
invalidated vide order dt.9.6.2016 passed by the Caste Scrutiny
Committee. Perusal of the order passed by the Scrutiny Committee
3 wp3787.16.odt
would reveal that there are no allegations regarding fraud in the said
order.
4. The Larger Bench of this Court in the case of Arun s/o
Vishwanath Sonone vs. State of Maharashtra, through its
Secretary, Department of Education, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 and
Ors. (WRIT PETITION NO.5297 OF 2013) reported in 2015 (1)
Mh.L.J. 457 has held that when a candidate's claim is invalidated
and when there is no finding of fraud and when the candidate has
put in substantial years of service, his services are entitled to be
protected. We find that the present case is squarely covered by the
law laid down by the Larger Bench of this Court.
5. In that view of the matter, we direct the respondents to
protect the services of the petitioner. It is directed that the petitioner
shall not be terminated on the ground of invalidation of his caste
claim. It is, however, directed that the petitioner shall not be entitled
to any of the benefits of belonging to 'Koli Mahadeo' Schedulted
Tribe.
4 wp3787.16.odt
Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms. No order as
to costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
*jaiswal.
5 wp3787.16.odt
CERTIFICATE
I certify that this Judgment uploaded is a true and correct copy
of original signed Judgment.
Uploaded by : Jaiswal, P.S. Uploaded on : 18.8.2016.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!