Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 2055 Bom
Judgement Date : 29 April, 2016
1 wp1450.05
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.1450 OF 2005
1) Rambhau Jagoba Bhajipale,
aged 67 years, occupation :
agriculturist, r/o Makardhokada,
Tahsil Umrer, District Nagpur.
2) Dilip s/o Tulshiram Zode,
aged 30 years, occupation :
agriculturist, r/o Makardhokada,
Tahsil Umrer, District Nagpur.
3) Narayan s/o Mahadeo Uikey,
aged 40 years, occupation :
agriculturist, r/o Deoli,
Tahsil Umred, District Nagpur.
4) Namdeo Jago Buradkar,
aged 50 years, occupation :
agriculturist, r/o Deoli,
Tahsil Umred, District Nagpur.
5) Bijaram Chindu Dandwe,
aged 35 years, occupation :
agriculturist, r/o Deoli,
Tahsil Umred, District Nagpur. ... Petitioners
- Versus -
1) State of Maharashtra, through
its Secretary, Department of
Forests and Revenue, Mantralaya,
Mumbai - 32.
::: Uploaded on - 03/05/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 30/07/2016 00:15:22 :::
2 wp1450.05
2) Divisional Commissioner,
Nagpur.
3) The Collector, Nagpur.
4) The S.D.O., Umred, District
Nagpur.
5) The Tahsildar, Umrer,
District Nagpur. ... Respondents
ig -----------------
Smt. A.R. Taiwade, Assistant Government Pleader for
respondents.
----------------
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND
P.N. DESHMUKH, JJ.
DATED : APRIL 29, 2016
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) :
Nobody appears for petitioners. Heard
Smt. Taiwade, learned Assistant Government Pleader
for respondents.
2) Challenge in the petition is to demand of
penalty and interest as Class II lands have been sold
3 wp1450.05
without prior permission and authorisation.
3) Smt. Taiwade, learned Assistant Government
Pleader for respondents, has pointed out that this Court
on 31/3/2005 granted ad interim relief and on
29/4/2005 while issuing rule in the matter, directed
petitioners to file an undertaking that they would not
dispose of the subject land or create any encumbrance
on it. The undertaking was to be filed on or before
20/6/2005, but that was never filed.
4) On 17/1/2006, learned Counsel for the
petitioners made a statement that petitioners did not
contact him despite communications and hence, order
dated 29/4/2005 could not be complied with. This
Court, therefore, vacated interim order.
5) Today, there is no appearance for petitioners.
6) In the backdrop of facts noted supra, we
4 wp1450.05
dismiss the writ petition with costs of rupees two
thousand payable to High Court Legal Services Sub-
Committee, Nagpur. Rule is discharged.
JUDGE JUDGE
khj
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!