Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 1133 Bom
Judgement Date : 2 April, 2016
1 30-wp4386-15.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.4386 OF 2015
1] Jai Hind Education Trust, Dhule
through its Director,
Iccharam Gangaram Patil,
Age Major, Occ. Legal Profession,
r/o.Jai Hind Colony, Deopur,
Dhule
2] The Head Master,
Jai Hind High School and Junior
College, Dhule
versus
ig ..Petitioners
1] The State of Maharashtra,
Through Secretary,
School Education and Sports
Department, Mantralaya,
Mumbai
2] The Director of Education,
Secondary and Higher Secondary,
Pune
3] The Deputy Director of Education,
Nashik Division, Nashik
4] The Education Officer (Secondary)
Zilla Parishad, Dhule ..Respondents
--
Mr.S.S.Patil, advocate for petitioners
Mr.S.G.Karlekar,, AGP for respondents - State
--
::: Uploaded on - 06/04/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 08/04/2016 23:59:11 :::
2 30-wp4386-15.odt
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE AND
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : APRIL 02, 2016
ORAL JUDGMENT (Per S.S. Shinde, J.) :
Heard.
2] Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. With
consent of the parties, the petition is taken up
for final hearing.
3] This petition takes exception to the order
passed by respondent no.4 on 20th December, 2014,
whereby one post of trained graduate teacher from
the approved staff of the petitioner no.2 -
school came to be cancelled permanently.
4] Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners
submits that the Education Officer had directed to
absorb the surplus teacher to teach Mathematics
subject, however, three vacancies, which were
3 30-wp4386-15.odt
advertised for appointment of the Assistant
Teachers, were for Science and Hindi subjects.
There was no vacancy for the teacher of
Mathematics subject. He further submits that the
Education Officer is not empowered to cancel the
approved post. He further submits that already the
petitioner - Institution has absorbed 13 surplus
teachers as directed by the respondent - Education
Officer. He further submits that a surplus teacher
about whom directions were given for absorption,
has been absorbed in another school by order dated
14th December, 2015 passed by the Education
Officer. The said teacher is absorbed in secondary
school namely, Adarsh Secondary School, Nijampur
Jaitane, Tq. Sakri, Dist. Dhule, as stated by the
Education Officer in paragraph 9 of his affidavit.
Learned counsel for the petitioners, therefore,
submits that the impugned order deserves to be set
aside.
4 30-wp4386-15.odt
5] On the other hand, learned AGP, relying on the
affidavit-in-reply filed on behalf of the
respondents, submits that keeping in view the
State Government's policy, more particularly, the
Government Circular dated 14th October, 2014 issued
by the School Education and Sports Department,
Government of Maharashtra, Mantralaya, Mumbai, it
was incumbent upon the petitioners to absorb the
surplus teacher namely, Manoj Gangaram Choudhari,
as directed by the Education Officer and
therefore, on refusal of the petitioners to absorb
the said surplus teacher, the Education Officer
has cancelled one post. Therefore, this Court may
not entertain the present Writ Petition.
6] We have heard learned counsel appearing for
the petitioners and learned AGP appearing for the
respondents - State. With their able assistance,
we have perused the pleadings in the petition,
grounds taken therein, annexures thereto, the
5 30-wp4386-15.odt
reply filed on behalf of the respondents - State
and Government Circular dated 14th October, 2014
reference of which, is already made herein above.
7] Upon careful perusal of the documents on
record, it is not in dispute that the petitioners
have absorbed 13 surplus teachers as directed by
the respondents. Apart from it, the assertion of
the petitioners that, there is no vacancy for the
teacher of Mathematics subject, has not been
denied by the respondents. It is also not stated
in the affidavit-in-reply filed on behalf of the
respondents that, when the respondent - Education
Officer cancelled one approved post, whether he
had sought approval from the higher
authorities/State Government for such drastic
action of cancellation of post. It is also
relevant to consider that the surplus teacher
namely, Manoj Gangaram Choudhari has already been
absorbed in another secondary school at Nijampur
6 30-wp4386-15.odt
Jaitane, Tq. Sakri, Dist. Dhule, as stated by the
Education Officer in his affidavit-in-reply.
8] Therefore, keeping in view the discussion in
the foregoing paragraphs, we are of the opinion
that the impugned order cannot sustain. The
respondent - Education Officer did not consider
the fact that the petitioner - Institution has
already absorbed 13 surplus teachers and there was
no post vacant for the teacher in Mathematics.
9] In the peculiar facts of the case, therefore,
the impugned order passed by the Education Officer
stands quashed and set aside.
10] The Writ Petition stands allowed on the above
terms. Rule is made absolute accordingly.
[SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.] [S.S. SHINDE, J.] kbp
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!