Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dilip Sopanrao Arjune vs Bajaj Allianz General Insurance ...
2016 Latest Caselaw 1095 Bom

Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 1095 Bom
Judgement Date : 1 April, 2016

Bombay High Court
Dilip Sopanrao Arjune vs Bajaj Allianz General Insurance ... on 1 April, 2016
Bench: P.R. Bora
                                           1 FA nos.2902/15 & FA st.1745/2015

            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY




                                                                          
                       BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                             FIRST APPEAL NO.2902 OF 2015




                                                  
                                          with
                                    CA No.5413/2014

      1.       Dilip S/o Sopanrao Arjune,




                                                 
               Age: 43 years, Occu: Service
               R/o Newasekar Nagar,
               Mantha Road, Jalna,
               Tq. & Dist. Jalna.                           ..APPELLANT
                                                    (Orig. Respondent No.1)




                                       
                       Versus

      1.       Bajaj Allianz General 
                             
               Insurance Co. Ltd.,
               Through its Branch Manager,
               2nd Floor, Rajendra Chamber,
                            
               Adalat Road, Aurangabad.       (Ori. Resp.2)

      2.       Meera W/o Raju Choudhary,
               Age: 31 years, Occu.: Household,
      

      3.       Vishal S/o Raju Choudhary,
               Age : 11 Years, Occu: Minor
   



      4.       Ganesh S/o Raju Choudhary,
               Age: 08 years, Occu.: Minor,

               No.3 and 4 are the Minors under





               guardianship of their real mother
               Meera W/o Raju Choudhary i.e
               Respondent No.2.

      5.       Uttam S/o Gopinath Choudhary,





               Age : 55 Years, Occu: Agriculture,

      6.       Sulabai W/o Uttam Choudhari,
               Age: 50 years, Occu.: Agril.,

               Resp.Nos. 2 to 6 are residents 
               of Village Keli Ghavan,
               Tq. Badnapur, Dist. Jalna.      (Ori. Claimants)

                                         ...




    ::: Uploaded on - 07/04/2016                  ::: Downloaded on - 29/07/2016 20:36:58 :::
                                          2 FA nos.2902/15 & FA st.1745/2015

                                       WITH




                                                                        
                        FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.1745 OF 2015
                                        with




                                                
                                    CA NO./2015

      1.       Dilip S/o Sopanrao Arjune,
               Age: 43 years, Occu: Service
               R/o Newasekar Nagar,




                                               
               Mantha Road, Jalna,
               Tq. & Dist. Jalna.                         ..APPELLANT
                                                  (Orig. Respondent No.1)
                       Versus




                                     
      1.       Bajaj Allianz General 
               Insurance Co. Ltd.,
                             
               Through its Branch Manager,
               2nd Floor, Rajendra Chamber,
               Adalat Road, Aurangabad.       (Ori. Resp.2)
                            
      2.       Smt. Chagabai W/o Sandu Madan,
               Age : 35 years, Occu.: Household

      3.       Pravin S/o Sandu Madan
               Age : 15 years, Occu.: Minor,
      


      4.       Kartik S/o Sandu Madan,
   



               Age: 15 years, Occu.:Minor

               No.3 and 4 are the Minors
               under guardianship of their





               real mother Chagubai Sandu Madan
               i.e. Respondent No.2

      5.       Nivrutti S/o Anna Madan
               Age: 65 years, Occu: Agriculture,





      6.       Smt.Kaushalyabai W/o Nivrutti Madan
               Age: 50 years, Occ: Agri.
                                                    (Ori. Claimants)
                                      -----


      Mr. Deshmukh Shambhuraje V, Adv.for Appellant;

      Mr. SG Chapalgaonkar, Adv. For Resp.No.1;




    ::: Uploaded on - 07/04/2016                ::: Downloaded on - 29/07/2016 20:36:58 :::
                                              3 FA nos.2902/15 & FA st.1745/2015

      Mr. GG Suryawanshi, Adv. For Resp.Nos. 2 to 6.




                                                                            
                                       -----
                                   CORAM :  P.R.BORA, J.

DATE :

1 st

April,2016.

ORAL JUDGMENT:

1) Heard. Admit. By consent, taken up for

final disposal.

2) Both the appeals since are arising out

of one accident both are being heard

simultaneously and are being decided by this

common order.

3) One claim petition was filed by the

legal heirs of the deceased, who was riding the

motor-cycle; whereas the other claim petition was

filed by the legal heirs of the deceased/pillion

rider. Both the claim petitions were allowed by

the Tribunal and the owner and the insurance

company both were held jointly and severally

liable to pay the amount of compensation to the

respective claimants.

4 FA nos.2902/15 & FA st.1745/2015

4) The learned Counsel for the appellants

brought to my notice that against the Judgment

and order passed in MACP No.74/2011 and 75/2011,

the Insurance company had preferred the appeal

being First Appeal No.1921/2013 and the same has

been allowed by this Court. The learned Counsel

has placed on record the copy of the said

judgment. The learned Counsel brought to my

notice that in the decision of the aforesaid

appeal, this Court has recorded an unambiguous

finding that the claimants have failed in proving

the involvement of the vehicle in question in

occurrence of the alleged accident. The learned

Counsel submitted that, however, since the appeal

was filed by the Insurance company, the same was

allowed to the extent of exonerating the

insurance company from its liability.

5) The learned counsel further submitted

that though attempt was made by the present

appellant of filing civil application in the

5 FA nos.2902/15 & FA st.1745/2015

appeal filed by the insurance company praying the

Court to exonerate the owner also from the

liability to pay the compensation, the

application came to be rejected with liberty to

the appellant to file independent proceedings.

The learned Counsel submitted that in the

circumstances, the original owner has filed these

two appeals challenging the Awards passed by the

Tribunal in the respective Claim Petitions.

6) The learned Counsel submitted that in

view of the clear finding recorded by this Court

in FA No.1921/2013 that the vehicle bearing No.

MH-21-V-541 was not involved in the alleged

accident, the present appeals deserve to be

allowed.

7) The learned Counsel appearing for the

claimants submitted that from the record it

cannot be certainly said that a clear finding is

recorded as regards non-involvement of the

6 FA nos.2902/15 & FA st.1745/2015

vehicle in question. The learned Counsel

submitted that the Court has only indicated the

circumstance that involvement of the vehicle in

question is not proved.

8) However, I am not impressed with the

arguments so advanced by the learned Counsel. I

have carefully gone through the judgment

delivered by this Court in FA no. 1921/2013. In

clear terms, the Court has recorded a finding

that the claimants have failed to prove

involvement of the vehicle concerned in the

occurrence of the alleged accident. When the

involvment of the vehicle alleged to be owned by

the present appellants has not been proved by the

original claimants, no liability can be saddled

upon the present appellants of paying any

compensation to the original claimants, i.e.

Respondent Nos. 2 to 6 herein. The judgment and

Awards dated 4th May, 2013, passed in MACP

Nos.75/2011 and 74/2011 passed by the learned

Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jalna,

7 FA nos.2902/15 & FA st.1745/2015

thus cannot be sustained and deserve to be

quashed and set aside. Hence, the following

order, -

ORDER

i) The judgments and Awards dated 4th May, 2013, passed in MACP Nos.75/2011 and 74/2011 by the learned Member, Motor Accident Claims

Tribunal, Jalna, stand quashed and set aside;

ii) The amount, if any, deposited by the

present appellants be refunded to them;

iii) Pending Civil Applications, if any,

stand disposed of.

sd/-

(P.R.BORA) JUDGE

bdv/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter