Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Anup Rajendra Singh Khamkar And ... vs Divisional Controller, ...
2005 Latest Caselaw 256 Bom

Citation : 2005 Latest Caselaw 256 Bom
Judgement Date : 28 February, 2005

Bombay High Court
Anup Rajendra Singh Khamkar And ... vs Divisional Controller, ... on 28 February, 2005
Equivalent citations: IV (2006) ACC 889, 2006 ACJ 2180
Author: D Deshpande
Bench: D Deshpande

JUDGMENT

D.G. Deshpande, J.

1. Heard advocates compensation from Rs. 1,80,000 that was for the appellants and the respondent. This awarded by the Tribunal. The claimants appeal is filed by the appellants who are lost their father. The mother had already the original claimants for enhancement of predeceased the father. Claimant No. 1 was 18 years old. He was the son and the two claimants were minor daughters aged about 13 years and 10 years respectively at the time of application. Salary of deceased was Rs. 3,000 per month. Tribunal accepted Rs. 2,000 per month as dependency, but adopted multiplier of 7 only. It is this part of the order which is challenged in the present appeal.

2. Learned Counsel for the respondent strenuously urged that multiplier has been properly adopted by the Tribunal looking to the age of the deceased father as 40 years. He, therefore, contended that no interference is required for.

3. I do not find any substance in this submission. The children/claimants were aged about 18, 13 and 10 years respectively on the date of the application and, the deceased father's age was 40 years and the claimant Nos. 2 and 3 were minors and unmarried and, though the dependency factor was properly taken at Rs. 2,000. But the application of multiplier of 7 was improper. In the circumstances and looking to the age of victim multiplier of 15 would have been proper. Therefore, the amount of compensation comes to Rs. 3,60,000, i.e., Rs. 2,000 x 12 x 15 = Rs. 3,60,000. In the original claim petition the claimants have claimed Rs. 3,00,000 and they do not want any more amount. Tribunal awarded Rs. 1,80,000. Therefore, appeal is required to be allowed partly. The claimants will be entitled for Rs. 3,00,000, i.e., by addition of Rs. 1,20,000 with interest thereupon. Hence the order:

The appeal is partly allowed.

Respondent to pay Rs. 1,20,000 more to the claimants with interest thereupon at the rate of 9 per cent from the date of the application till payment.

No order as to costs.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter